Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Webster Zavier's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Webster Zavier's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Webster Zavier's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Webster Zavier's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:29. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:34 | 40:38 to 39:04 | 45.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:47 | 06:12 to 05:25 | 22.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:26 | 04:51 to 04:25 | 12.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:23 | 04:45 to 04:22 | 11.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:13 | 02:05 to 01:52 | 6.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:06 | 04:18 to 04:12 | 2.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:10 to 04:10 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:04 to 02:04 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:32 to 04:32 | 0.0% |
| Webster Zavier | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:20 | 00:00 | 04:22 -00:02 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:10 | 04:20 | 04:21 -00:11 | 04:22 -00:02 |
| Running 2 | 04:20 | 08:30 | 04:42 -00:22 | 08:43 -00:13 |
| Sled Push | 02:04 | 12:50 | 02:43 -00:39 | 13:25 -00:35 |
| Running 3 | 04:41 | 14:54 | 05:06 -00:25 | 16:08 -01:14 |
| Sled Pull | 04:18 | 19:35 | 04:32 -00:14 | 21:14 -01:39 |
| Running 4 | 04:48 | 23:53 | 05:04 -00:16 | 25:46 -01:53 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:51 | 28:41 | 04:50 +00:01 | 30:50 -02:09 |
| Running 5 | 07:02 | 33:32 | 05:13 +01:49 | 35:40 -02:08 |
| Rowing | 04:32 | 40:34 | 04:40 -00:08 | 40:53 -00:19 |
| Running 6 | 04:58 | 45:06 | 05:06 -00:08 | 45:33 -00:27 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:05 | 50:04 | 02:02 +00:03 | 50:39 -00:35 |
| Running 7 | 05:00 | 52:09 | 05:04 -00:04 | 52:41 -00:32 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:45 | 57:09 | 04:42 +00:03 | 57:45 -00:36 |
| Running 8 | 05:31 | 01:01:54 | 05:33 -00:02 | 01:02:27 -00:33 |
| Wall Balls | 06:12 | 01:07:25 | 05:56 +00:16 | 01:08:00 -00:35 |
| Roxzone | 06:36 | 01:20:06 | 06:10 +00:26 | 01:20:06 |
Zavier Webster performed strongly in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, achieving a top 19% finish in both his overall category and age group. He demonstrated considerable strength in the Ski Erg and Sled Push events, indicating a solid base of power and endurance. However, his total running time was slightly slower than average, suggesting that while he has a balanced athlete profile, incorporating both strength and running capabilities, his running may need some focused improvement. Notably, his pacing showed some inconsistency; he maintained competitive times in the early running segments but slowed significantly in Running 5, indicating a possible early energy expenditure or fatigue management issue.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lucas Gavin | 2021 London | 01:20:18 | |
| Hanna John | 2023 London | 01:19:50 | |
| Fung Chun Yu | 2022 Hong Kong | 01:19:39 | |
| Van Der Vlugt Rick | 2021 Amsterdam | 01:19:38 | |
| Rettich Florian | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:19:57 | |
| Hilzinger Hendrik | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:19:50 | |
| Casati Matteo | 2024 Rimini | 01:19:41 | |
| Devlin Sam | 2024 Birmingham | 01:20:12 | |
| Testa Andrea | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:20:30 | |
| Yusof Azri | 2023 Singapore | 01:19:58 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
