Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Grindrod Tom's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Grindrod Tom's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Grindrod Tom's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Grindrod Tom's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:38. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:52 | 45:41 to 41:49 | 83.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:46 | 06:52 to 06:06 | 16.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:20 to 04:20 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:25 to 02:25 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:34 to 04:34 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:45 to 04:45 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:24 to 04:24 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:52 to 01:52 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:43 to 04:43 | 0.0% |
| Grindrod Tom | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:16 | 00:00 | 04:38 +00:38 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:20 | 05:16 | 04:27 -00:07 | 04:38 +00:38 |
| Running 2 | 05:11 | 09:36 | 04:58 +00:13 | 09:05 +00:31 |
| Sled Push | 02:25 | 14:47 | 02:56 -00:31 | 14:03 +00:44 |
| Running 3 | 05:47 | 17:12 | 05:25 +00:22 | 16:59 +00:13 |
| Sled Pull | 04:34 | 22:59 | 05:00 -00:26 | 22:24 +00:35 |
| Running 4 | 05:24 | 27:33 | 05:24 +00:00 | 27:24 +00:09 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:45 | 32:57 | 05:20 -00:35 | 32:48 +00:09 |
| Running 5 | 05:53 | 37:42 | 05:34 +00:19 | 38:08 -00:26 |
| Rowing | 04:24 | 43:35 | 04:49 -00:25 | 43:42 -00:07 |
| Running 6 | 05:33 | 47:59 | 05:27 +00:06 | 48:31 -00:32 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:52 | 53:32 | 02:12 -00:20 | 53:58 -00:26 |
| Running 7 | 06:10 | 55:24 | 05:24 +00:46 | 56:10 -00:46 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:43 | 01:01:34 | 05:06 -00:23 | 01:01:34 +00:00 |
| Running 8 | 06:31 | 01:06:17 | 06:02 +00:29 | 01:06:40 -00:23 |
| Wall Balls | 06:52 | 01:12:48 | 06:33 +00:19 | 01:12:42 +00:06 |
| Roxzone | 06:42 | 01:26:12 | 06:57 -00:15 | 01:26:12 |
Tom Grindrod demonstrated a commendable performance in the Manchester 2024 Hyrox race, finishing in the top 65% of all participants and the top 66% of his age group. His overall time was 01:26:12, with a total running time of 00:45:41, which was 02:33 slower than average. His best running lap was clocked at 00:05:11.
Tom showed a balanced performance profile, with both his running and strength segments showing areas of above-average performance. However, his overall slower total running time indicates a need for increased focus on his running training. His pacing during the initial segments of the race was slower compared to the average, indicating a potentially cautious start, but he managed to maintain a steady pace in the latter segments.
For future races, Tom should consider implementing the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Valenzuela Roberto | 2024 Melbourne | 01:26:15 | |
| Odonnell Jamie | 2023 London | 01:26:01 | |
| Leary Rowan | 2021 Birmingham | 01:25:52 | |
| Fokker Marco | 2024 Maastricht | 01:26:06 | |
| Ledwith Andrew | 2024 Manchester | 01:26:18 | |
| Mitchell Joe | 2024 Paris | 01:26:37 | |
| Wimmer Leopold | 2023 München | 01:26:41 | |
| Wagemakers Sjors | 2023 Hannover | 01:26:17 | |
| Cunningham Gregory | 2024 London | 01:26:11 | |
| Ward Neil | 2023 London | 01:26:22 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
