Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Gallagher Joe's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Gallagher Joe's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Gallagher Joe's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Gallagher Joe's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:42. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:32 | 06:49 to 04:17 | 44.4% |
| Sled Pull | 01:01 | 05:07 to 04:06 | 17.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:43 | 06:00 to 05:17 | 12.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:40 | 04:56 to 04:16 | 11.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:27 | 02:17 to 01:50 | 7.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:19 | 02:42 to 02:23 | 5.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:04 to 04:04 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:31 to 04:31 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 36:06 to 36:06 | 0.0% |
| Gallagher Joe | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:43 | 00:00 | 04:20 +00:23 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:04 | 04:43 | 04:20 -00:16 | 04:20 +00:23 |
| Running 2 | 04:05 | 08:47 | 04:39 -00:34 | 08:40 +00:07 |
| Sled Push | 02:42 | 12:52 | 02:41 +00:01 | 13:19 -00:27 |
| Running 3 | 04:18 | 15:34 | 05:02 -00:44 | 16:00 -00:26 |
| Sled Pull | 05:07 | 19:52 | 04:27 +00:40 | 21:02 -01:10 |
| Running 4 | 04:21 | 24:59 | 05:00 -00:39 | 25:29 -00:30 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:49 | 29:20 | 04:43 +02:06 | 30:29 -01:09 |
| Running 5 | 04:29 | 36:09 | 05:10 -00:41 | 35:12 +00:57 |
| Rowing | 04:31 | 40:38 | 04:40 -00:09 | 40:22 +00:16 |
| Running 6 | 04:24 | 45:09 | 05:03 -00:39 | 45:02 +00:07 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:17 | 49:33 | 02:01 +00:16 | 50:05 -00:32 |
| Running 7 | 04:33 | 51:50 | 05:01 -00:28 | 52:06 -00:16 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:56 | 56:23 | 04:36 +00:20 | 57:07 -00:44 |
| Running 8 | 05:17 | 01:01:19 | 05:29 -00:12 | 01:01:43 -00:24 |
| Wall Balls | 06:00 | 01:06:36 | 05:47 +00:13 | 01:07:12 -00:36 |
| Roxzone | 06:27 | 01:18:57 | 05:58 +00:29 | 01:18:57 |
Joe Gallagher demonstrated an impressive performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race, finishing in the top 20% of all 4107 athletes and top 24% in his age group. His strengths were clearly in his running abilities as his total running time was 03:54 faster than the average. This indicates that Joe has a strong runner profile. He also showed commendable efforts in the Ski Erg, Running 2, and Running 3 segments, where he finished faster than the average times. However, it's evident that he started the race a bit slower in Running 1 before picking up the pace in the following segments. This could suggest a need for a better pacing strategy to start the race at a more optimal speed.
From the analysis of Joe's performance, a few race strategies can be suggested:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lanigan Daniel | 2024 Manchester | 01:18:54 | |
| Martinez Francis | 2022 London | 01:19:25 | |
| Kunzel Benjamin | 2024 New York | 01:19:01 | |
| Saint Ian | 2023 Glasgow | 01:18:38 | |
| Gamman Jon | 2022 London | 01:19:22 | |
| Marshall Adam | 2024 Birmingham | 01:18:35 | |
| Warren Oliver | 2023 London | 01:18:33 | |
| Holz Dustin | 2019 Nürnberg | 01:19:09 | |
| Miller Nicholas | 2021 Birmingham | 01:18:57 | |
| Clarke Charlton | 2024 London | 01:18:50 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 London | 01:16:05 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
