Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 443 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Neil Shannon's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Neil Shannon's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Neil Shannon's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Neil Shannon's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:06 | 01:00:30 to 55:24 | 78.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:42 | 03:30 to 02:48 | 10.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:31 | 09:06 to 08:35 | 7.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:11 | 06:33 to 06:22 | 2.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:16 to 05:16 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:22 to 03:22 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 07:06 to 07:06 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:48 to 05:48 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:15 to 05:15 | 0.0% |
| Neil Shannon | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:26 | 00:00 | 06:00 -00:34 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:16 | 05:26 | 05:30 -00:14 | 06:00 -00:34 |
| Running 2 | 07:13 | 10:42 | 06:37 +00:36 | 11:30 -00:48 |
| Sled Push | 03:22 | 17:55 | 03:26 -00:04 | 18:07 -00:12 |
| Running 3 | 07:42 | 21:17 | 07:05 +00:37 | 21:33 -00:16 |
| Sled Pull | 07:06 | 28:59 | 07:34 -00:28 | 28:38 +00:21 |
| Running 4 | 07:43 | 36:05 | 07:08 +00:35 | 36:12 -00:07 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:06 | 43:48 | 08:49 +00:17 | 43:20 +00:28 |
| Running 5 | 08:09 | 52:54 | 07:25 +00:44 | 52:09 +00:45 |
| Rowing | 05:48 | 01:01:03 | 05:54 -00:06 | 59:34 +01:29 |
| Running 6 | 07:49 | 01:06:51 | 07:19 +00:30 | 01:05:28 +01:23 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:30 | 01:14:40 | 02:46 +00:44 | 01:12:47 +01:53 |
| Running 7 | 07:43 | 01:18:10 | 07:17 +00:26 | 01:15:33 +02:37 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:33 | 01:25:53 | 06:33 +00:00 | 01:22:50 +03:03 |
| Running 8 | 08:48 | 01:32:26 | 08:19 +00:29 | 01:29:23 +03:03 |
| Wall Balls | 05:15 | 01:41:14 | 07:05 -01:50 | 01:37:42 +03:32 |
| Roxzone | 07:56 | 01:54:19 | 09:32 -01:36 | 01:54:19 |
Shannon's best running lap was 00:05:26, indicating that she has the potential to excel in running segments. Her splits analysis shows that she performed better than average in the Running 1 and Ski Erg segments, but slower than average in the Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, Running 5, Running 6, Running 7, and Running 8 segments.
By implementing these strategies and incorporating the suggested exercises, drills, and training routines, Shannon Neil can enhance her performance in the HYROX race and improve her overall ranking.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Canul Chuc Diana | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:53:50 | |
| Schlüter Lea | 2024 Köln | 01:54:28 | |
| Scheffers Sietske | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:54:16 | |
| Burrus Dale | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:53:54 | |
| Coombs Samantha | 2023 London | 01:54:44 | |
| Millward Kate | 2024 Glasgow | 01:54:14 | |
| Bate Georgia | 2024 Melbourne | 01:54:31 | |
| Farrelly Jo | 2022 London | 01:54:22 | |
| Villatoro Liliana | 2023 New York | 01:54:49 | |
| Yanes Sisy | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:54:17 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
