Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Kelly Narbz's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kelly Narbz's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kelly Narbz's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kelly Narbz's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:15. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:33 | 41:48 to 39:15 | 48.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:16 | 05:43 to 04:27 | 24.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:41 | 04:54 to 04:13 | 13.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:38 | 02:31 to 01:53 | 12.1% |
| Rowing | 00:07 | 04:42 to 04:35 | 2.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:06 to 04:06 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:46 to 01:46 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:15 to 03:15 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:59 to 04:59 | 0.0% |
| Kelly Narbz | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:07 | 00:00 | 04:23 -00:16 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:06 | 04:07 | 04:21 -00:15 | 04:23 -00:16 |
| Running 2 | 04:47 | 08:13 | 04:44 +00:03 | 08:44 -00:31 |
| Sled Push | 01:46 | 13:00 | 02:44 -00:58 | 13:28 -00:28 |
| Running 3 | 05:08 | 14:46 | 05:07 +00:01 | 16:12 -01:26 |
| Sled Pull | 04:54 | 19:54 | 04:34 +00:20 | 21:19 -01:25 |
| Running 4 | 04:54 | 24:48 | 05:06 -00:12 | 25:53 -01:05 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:43 | 29:42 | 04:54 +00:49 | 30:59 -01:17 |
| Running 5 | 05:11 | 35:25 | 05:15 -00:04 | 35:53 -00:28 |
| Rowing | 04:42 | 40:36 | 04:41 +00:01 | 41:08 -00:32 |
| Running 6 | 05:52 | 45:18 | 05:08 +00:44 | 45:49 -00:31 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:31 | 51:10 | 02:04 +00:27 | 50:57 +00:13 |
| Running 7 | 05:26 | 53:41 | 05:06 +00:20 | 53:01 +00:40 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:15 | 59:07 | 04:45 -01:30 | 58:07 +01:00 |
| Running 8 | 06:25 | 01:02:22 | 05:35 +00:50 | 01:02:52 -00:30 |
| Wall Balls | 04:59 | 01:08:47 | 05:57 -00:58 | 01:08:27 +00:20 |
| Roxzone | 06:52 | 01:20:32 | 06:08 +00:44 | 01:20:32 |
Narbz Kelly delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, ranking in the top 19% overall and 22% within his age group. His overall time of 1:20:32 reflects a strong showing, particularly in strength-based events like the Sled Push and Sandbag Lunges, where he ranked in the top 4% and 1% respectively. However, his total running time was slightly slower than average by 1:02, indicating room for improvement in endurance and pacing. The initial running splits suggest a slightly fast start, especially with Running 1 being 13 seconds faster than average. This fast start could have led to fatigue, affecting later running segments. Kelly appears to have a balanced profile with a slight edge in strength, but improving running efficiency and transition times could enhance his overall performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Watson Matthew | 2024 Berlin | 01:20:56 | |
| O'Malley Brian | 2024 Dublin | 01:20:27 | |
| Llamazares González David | 2024 Bilbao | 01:20:24 | |
| Jenkins James | 2024 London | 01:20:37 | |
| Notnagel Tom | 2023 Hamburg | 01:20:10 | |
| Allram Rene | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:20:29 | |
| Hechle Dave | 2024 Birmingham | 01:20:51 | |
| Oshea Brendan | 2023 London | 01:20:05 | |
| Andreatta Jarrod | 2024 Melbourne | 01:20:14 | |
| Van Toledo Paul | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:20:58 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Brisbane | 01:22:59 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
