Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Madrid using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hagmann David's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hagmann David's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hagmann David's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hagmann David's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:07. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 07:51 | 54:36 to 46:45 | 96.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:16 | 02:41 to 02:25 | 3.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:35 to 04:35 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:52 to 02:52 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:54 to 04:54 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:55 to 04:55 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:02 to 05:02 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:51 to 03:51 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:05 to 07:05 | 0.0% |
| Hagmann David | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:18 | 00:00 | 05:02 -00:44 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:35 | 04:18 | 04:38 -00:03 | 05:02 -00:44 |
| Running 2 | 04:39 | 08:53 | 05:28 -00:49 | 09:40 -00:47 |
| Sled Push | 02:52 | 13:32 | 03:19 -00:27 | 15:08 -01:36 |
| Running 3 | 04:54 | 16:24 | 05:59 -01:05 | 18:27 -02:03 |
| Sled Pull | 04:54 | 21:18 | 05:41 -00:47 | 24:26 -03:08 |
| Running 4 | 04:48 | 26:12 | 06:00 -01:12 | 30:07 -03:55 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:55 | 31:00 | 06:26 -01:31 | 36:07 -05:07 |
| Running 5 | 06:19 | 35:55 | 06:15 +00:04 | 42:33 -06:38 |
| Rowing | 05:02 | 42:14 | 05:06 -00:04 | 48:48 -06:34 |
| Running 6 | 08:44 | 47:16 | 06:03 +02:41 | 53:54 -06:38 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:41 | 56:00 | 02:27 +00:14 | 59:57 -03:57 |
| Running 7 | 08:44 | 58:41 | 06:04 +02:40 | 01:02:24 -03:43 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:51 | 01:07:25 | 06:03 -02:12 | 01:08:28 -01:03 |
| Running 8 | 12:14 | 01:11:16 | 07:00 +05:14 | 01:14:31 -03:15 |
| Wall Balls | 07:05 | 01:23:30 | 07:50 -00:45 | 01:21:31 +01:59 |
| Roxzone | 07:13 | 01:37:41 | 08:20 -01:07 | 01:37:41 |
Hagmann's overall time was 01:37:41, with a total running time of 00:54:36. His total running time was 08:32 slower than the average for his finish time, indicating that he may need to work on his overall fitness and transition time in order to improve this segment.
His best running lap was 00:04:18, which was 00:32 faster than the average. This highlights his strength in running and suggests that he has a runner profile. However, his slower total running time indicates that he may need to focus on improving his running endurance.
In conclusion, David Hagmann had a solid performance in the HYROX race in Madrid. While he performed well in certain segments, there are areas for improvement, particularly in running endurance and speed. By implementing specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, hill sprints, and strength training exercises, he can enhance his overall performance. Additionally, focusing on efficient transitions and proper hydration and nutrition can further contribute to his success in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Heenan Tom | 2022 London | 01:37:41 | |
| Bishop Tommy Lee | 2024 London | 01:38:06 | |
| Dankwah Yaw | 2021 Birmingham | 01:37:35 | |
| Picazo Sanchez Jose Alfonso | 2024 Madrid | 01:37:46 | |
| Lorenzen Uwe | 2018 Hamburg | 01:37:22 | |
| Huesmann Christian | 2023 Hamburg | 01:37:23 | |
| Ng Choon Yean | 2024 Singapore | 01:37:43 | |
| Chase Joel | 2023 London | 01:38:00 | |
| Thiem Daniel | 2019 Frankfurt | 01:37:59 | |
| Morgan Ainsley | 2024 London | 01:37:38 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:30:55 | |
| 2022 Frankfurt | 01:33:19 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
