Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 714 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Elizen Annemiek's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Elizen Annemiek's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Elizen Annemiek's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Elizen Annemiek's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:18. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:34 | 09:03 to 07:29 | 47.5% |
| Run Total | 00:36 | 52:08 to 51:32 | 18.2% |
| Rowing | 00:34 | 06:15 to 05:41 | 17.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:30 | 05:53 to 05:23 | 15.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:04 | 05:44 to 05:40 | 2.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:59 to 01:59 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:33 to 06:33 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:27 to 02:27 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:24 to 05:24 | 0.0% |
| Elizen Annemiek | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:29 | 00:00 | 05:39 -01:10 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:53 | 04:29 | 05:23 +00:30 | 05:39 -01:10 |
| Running 2 | 06:21 | 10:22 | 06:11 +00:10 | 11:02 -00:40 |
| Sled Push | 01:59 | 16:43 | 03:08 -01:09 | 17:13 -00:30 |
| Running 3 | 06:21 | 18:42 | 06:33 -00:12 | 20:21 -01:39 |
| Sled Pull | 06:33 | 25:03 | 06:44 -00:11 | 26:54 -01:51 |
| Running 4 | 06:42 | 31:36 | 06:36 +00:06 | 33:38 -02:02 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:03 | 38:18 | 07:39 +01:24 | 40:14 -01:56 |
| Running 5 | 07:07 | 47:21 | 06:50 +00:17 | 47:53 -00:32 |
| Rowing | 06:15 | 54:28 | 05:42 +00:33 | 54:43 -00:15 |
| Running 6 | 06:53 | 01:00:43 | 06:44 +00:09 | 01:00:25 +00:18 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:27 | 01:07:36 | 02:34 -00:07 | 01:07:09 +00:27 |
| Running 7 | 06:40 | 01:10:03 | 06:41 -00:01 | 01:09:43 +00:20 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:44 | 01:16:43 | 05:50 -00:06 | 01:16:24 +00:19 |
| Running 8 | 07:39 | 01:22:27 | 07:31 +00:08 | 01:22:14 +00:13 |
| Wall Balls | 05:24 | 01:30:06 | 06:10 -00:46 | 01:29:45 +00:21 |
| Roxzone | 09:13 | 01:44:33 | 08:38 +00:35 | 01:44:33 |
Annemiek Elizen performed commendably at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, finishing in the top 25% overall and top 28% in her age group. With an overall time of 01:44:33, her total running time of 00:52:08 was notably 01:20 faster than the average, indicating she has a strong running profile. Her pacing strategy was effective at the start, with her first running segment significantly faster than the average, suggesting a strong initial burst. However, this initial speed was not consistently maintained across all runs, as observed in the gradual slowdown towards the later running segments. Annemiek's performance in strength-based exercises like the Sled Push was outstanding (2nd percentile), highlighting her potential in strength events, albeit with room for improvement in other strength segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Zborowska Marta | 2023 London | 01:45:01 | |
| Lubel Ruth | 2023 London | 01:44:03 | |
| Wahl Regine | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:44:16 | |
| Bogdon Sandra | 2019 Hamburg | 01:44:51 | |
| Itzel Mejía Sandoval Sandra | 2024 Mexico City | 01:45:00 | |
| Neubauer Monique | 2022 Leipzig | 01:44:06 | |
| Robertson Amy | 2023 Glasgow | 01:44:06 | |
| Williams Charlotte | 2024 Birmingham | 01:44:36 | |
| Owen Rachel | 2024 London | 01:44:38 | |
| Dryden Sarah | 2024 Stockholm | 01:44:33 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:33:24 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
