Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Peterson James's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Peterson James's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Peterson James's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Peterson James's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:17. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:02 | 08:03 to 06:01 | 32.4% |
| Run Total | 01:55 | 43:24 to 41:29 | 30.5% |
| Sled Pull | 01:34 | 06:10 to 04:36 | 24.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:46 | 03:27 to 02:41 | 12.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:10 to 04:10 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:21 to 04:21 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:42 to 01:42 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Peterson James | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 02:43 | 00:00 | 04:36 -01:53 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:10 | 02:43 | 04:27 -00:17 | 04:36 -01:53 |
| Running 2 | 05:17 | 06:53 | 04:57 +00:20 | 09:03 -02:10 |
| Sled Push | 03:27 | 12:10 | 02:54 +00:33 | 14:00 -01:50 |
| Running 3 | 05:53 | 15:37 | 05:23 +00:30 | 16:54 -01:17 |
| Sled Pull | 06:10 | 21:30 | 04:57 +01:13 | 22:17 -00:47 |
| Running 4 | 05:55 | 27:40 | 05:21 +00:34 | 27:14 +00:26 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:21 | 33:35 | 05:18 -00:57 | 32:35 +01:00 |
| Running 5 | 05:51 | 37:56 | 05:31 +00:20 | 37:53 +00:03 |
| Rowing | 04:38 | 43:47 | 04:49 -00:11 | 43:24 +00:23 |
| Running 6 | 06:01 | 48:25 | 05:23 +00:38 | 48:13 +00:12 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:42 | 54:26 | 02:12 -00:30 | 53:36 +00:50 |
| Running 7 | 06:02 | 56:08 | 05:22 +00:40 | 55:48 +00:20 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:25 | 01:02:10 | 05:06 -00:41 | 01:01:10 +01:00 |
| Running 8 | 05:46 | 01:06:35 | 05:59 -00:13 | 01:06:16 +00:19 |
| Wall Balls | 08:03 | 01:12:21 | 06:30 +01:33 | 01:12:15 +00:06 |
| Roxzone | 05:18 | 01:25:34 | 06:49 -01:31 | 01:25:34 |
James showed strength in the running 1 segment, completing it in 00:02:43, which was 01:45 faster than the average time. He also performed well in the Ski Erg and Burpees Broad Jump segments, finishing 00:15 and 00:36 faster than the average times, respectively. However, he struggled in the Running 2, Sled Push, Sled Pull, Running 3, Running 4, Running 5, Running 6, Running 7, Wall Balls, and Roxzone segments, where he was slower than the average times.
Overall, James Peterson showed strength in certain segments but has room for improvement in others. By focusing on specific areas of weakness, implementing targeted training strategies, and maintaining a strategic race approach, he can enhance his performance in future Hyrox races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Van Den Berg Mark | 2024 Maastricht | 01:25:14 | |
| Fanegas Bosch Pau | 2023 Bilbao | 01:25:18 | |
| Lohmann Marius | 2024 Köln | 01:25:22 | |
| Craft Ben | 2023 Birmingham | 01:25:42 | |
| Okada Kaito | 2024 Beijing | 01:25:52 | |
| Gallardo Andres | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:26:02 | |
| Esparza Martinez Vicente | 2023 Valencia | 01:25:36 | |
| Carmichael Duncan | 2024 Cape Town | 01:26:04 | |
| Nieskens Douwe | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:25:42 | |
| Carr Joe | 2024 Madrid | 01:25:50 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 London | 01:23:51 | |
| 2023 London | 01:19:16 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
