Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Kirkham Hannah's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kirkham Hannah's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kirkham Hannah's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kirkham Hannah's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:29. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:51 | 07:48 to 04:57 | 52.0% |
| Run Total | 02:06 | 49:12 to 47:06 | 38.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:23 | 03:08 to 02:45 | 7.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:09 | 06:27 to 06:18 | 2.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:36 to 04:36 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:09 to 05:09 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:50 to 04:50 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:26 to 01:26 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Kirkham Hannah | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:36 | 00:00 | 05:18 +00:18 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:36 | 05:36 | 05:12 -00:36 | 05:18 +00:18 |
| Running 2 | 09:24 | 10:12 | 05:41 +03:43 | 10:30 -00:18 |
| Sled Push | 03:08 | 19:36 | 02:52 +00:16 | 16:11 +03:25 |
| Running 3 | 05:15 | 22:44 | 06:00 -00:45 | 19:03 +03:41 |
| Sled Pull | 05:09 | 27:59 | 06:03 -00:54 | 25:03 +02:56 |
| Running 4 | 05:19 | 33:08 | 06:02 -00:43 | 31:06 +02:02 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:27 | 38:27 | 06:38 -00:11 | 37:08 +01:19 |
| Running 5 | 05:36 | 44:54 | 06:12 -00:36 | 43:46 +01:08 |
| Rowing | 04:50 | 50:30 | 05:28 -00:38 | 49:58 +00:32 |
| Running 6 | 05:50 | 55:20 | 06:03 -00:13 | 55:26 -00:06 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:26 | 01:01:10 | 02:22 -00:56 | 01:01:29 -00:19 |
| Running 7 | 05:50 | 01:02:36 | 06:04 -00:14 | 01:03:51 -01:15 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:38 | 01:08:26 | 05:04 -00:26 | 01:09:55 -01:29 |
| Running 8 | 06:26 | 01:13:04 | 06:33 -00:07 | 01:14:59 -01:55 |
| Wall Balls | 07:48 | 01:19:30 | 05:22 +02:26 | 01:21:32 -02:02 |
| Roxzone | 07:05 | 01:34:15 | 07:21 -00:16 | 01:34:15 |
Hannah Kirkham demonstrated an impressive performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race, ranking in the top 16% of all athletes and top 17% in her age group. Despite falling behind the average in total running time, Hannah excelled in her strength segments. This suggests a stronger strength profile as opposed to running, particularly evident in her elite performance in the Ski Erg and Rowing sections, where she significantly outperformed the average. In terms of pacing, her performance in the first four running segments suggests a slow start in Running 1 and 2, with a strong comeback in Running 3 and 4.
Given her strength profile, Hannah may benefit from conserving energy in the initial running segments to maximize performance in her strength exercises. Additionally, regular hydration and nutrition during the race can help maintain energy levels. Hannah should also focus on efficient transitions between exercises to minimize roxzone time. Lastly, incorporating a thorough warm-up before the race and a cool-down afterwards can prevent injuries and improve recovery.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Van De Burgwal Ashley | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:34:35 | |
| Brown Amy | 2024 Melbourne | 01:34:25 | |
| Berg Morgan | 2023 London | 01:33:57 | |
| Campbell Jennifer | 2023 Glasgow | 01:34:31 | |
| Barnetby Annie | 2024 Melbourne | 01:34:22 | |
| Macklin Yolande | 2024 Birmingham | 01:34:44 | |
| Au Young Clare | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:33:47 | |
| Faria Tania | 2023 Singapore | 01:34:02 | |
| Brandt Aurélie | 2024 Berlin | 01:34:04 | |
| Halsall Rachel | 2024 London | 01:33:59 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
