Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Dallas using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Serfass Trevor's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Serfass Trevor's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Serfass Trevor's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Serfass Trevor's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:28. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Push | 01:00 | 04:15 to 03:15 | 22.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:54 | 03:19 to 02:25 | 20.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:47 | 06:20 to 05:33 | 17.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:42 | 06:55 to 06:13 | 15.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:42 | 08:10 to 07:28 | 15.7% |
| Rowing | 00:23 | 05:25 to 05:02 | 8.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:37 to 04:37 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 45:16 to 45:16 | 0.0% |
| Serfass Trevor | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:33 | 00:00 | 05:01 -00:28 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:37 | 04:33 | 04:38 -00:01 | 05:01 -00:28 |
| Running 2 | 05:10 | 09:10 | 05:27 -00:17 | 09:39 -00:29 |
| Sled Push | 04:15 | 14:20 | 03:18 +00:57 | 15:06 -00:46 |
| Running 3 | 05:38 | 18:35 | 05:59 -00:21 | 18:24 +00:11 |
| Sled Pull | 06:20 | 24:13 | 05:41 +00:39 | 24:23 -00:10 |
| Running 4 | 05:33 | 30:33 | 06:00 -00:27 | 30:04 +00:29 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:55 | 36:06 | 06:26 +00:29 | 36:04 +00:02 |
| Running 5 | 05:43 | 43:01 | 06:15 -00:32 | 42:30 +00:31 |
| Rowing | 05:25 | 48:44 | 05:06 +00:19 | 48:45 -00:01 |
| Running 6 | 05:59 | 54:09 | 06:03 -00:04 | 53:51 +00:18 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:19 | 01:00:08 | 02:27 +00:52 | 59:54 +00:14 |
| Running 7 | 05:32 | 01:03:27 | 06:03 -00:31 | 01:02:21 +01:06 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:25 | 01:08:59 | 06:02 -01:37 | 01:08:24 +00:35 |
| Running 8 | 07:11 | 01:13:24 | 07:00 +00:11 | 01:14:26 -01:02 |
| Wall Balls | 08:10 | 01:20:35 | 07:50 +00:20 | 01:21:26 -00:51 |
| Roxzone | 08:57 | 01:37:35 | 08:19 +00:38 | 01:37:35 |
Trevor's best running lap was 00:04:33, indicating that he has a good running ability. His splits analysis shows that he performed particularly well in Running 1, Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, Running 5, Running 6, Running 7, and Sandbag Lunges, consistently finishing faster than the average time for these segments.
To enhance his overall performance, Trevor should incorporate a well-rounded training routine that includes both cardio and strength training. This will help improve his endurance, speed, and overall fitness. He should also consider including specific exercises and drills that target the segments he needs to improve on, as mentioned above. Regular practice and consistency in training will be key to his success in future Hyrox races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Botha John | 2024 Melbourne | 01:37:19 | |
| Munday Daniel | 2024 London | 01:37:16 | |
| Chase Joel | 2023 London | 01:38:00 | |
| Denis Bryan | 2024 New York | 01:38:02 | |
| Daoudou Assafy | 2024 Marseille | 01:38:04 | |
| Garbin Aldo | 2024 Milan | 01:37:22 | |
| Mccullough Neeson | 2024 Dublin | 01:37:55 | |
| Sin Benjamin | 2023 Sydney | 01:37:50 | |
| Ellul Ryan | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:37:24 | |
| Goodlad Mitch | 2023 Glasgow | 01:37:53 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Dallas | 01:28:05 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
