Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 43 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Katz Harris's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Katz Harris's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Katz Harris's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Katz Harris's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 25:04. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 10:12 | 01:09:51 to 59:39 | 40.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 09:13 | 17:39 to 08:26 | 36.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:24 | 12:31 to 09:07 | 13.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:58 | 08:50 to 07:52 | 3.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:37 | 03:57 to 03:20 | 2.5% |
| Rowing | 00:30 | 06:13 to 05:43 | 2.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:10 | 05:17 to 05:07 | 0.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:42 to 03:42 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 09:02 to 09:02 | 0.0% |
| Katz Harris | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:50 | 00:00 | 06:36 +00:14 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:17 | 06:50 | 05:13 +00:04 | 06:36 +00:14 |
| Running 2 | 07:37 | 12:07 | 07:04 +00:33 | 11:49 +00:18 |
| Sled Push | 03:42 | 19:44 | 04:35 -00:53 | 18:53 +00:51 |
| Running 3 | 09:13 | 23:26 | 08:41 +00:32 | 23:28 -00:02 |
| Sled Pull | 08:50 | 32:39 | 09:33 -00:43 | 32:09 +00:30 |
| Running 4 | 08:41 | 41:29 | 08:42 -00:01 | 41:42 -00:13 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 12:31 | 50:10 | 11:41 +00:50 | 50:24 -00:14 |
| Running 5 | 09:09 | 01:02:41 | 09:19 -00:10 | 01:02:05 +00:36 |
| Rowing | 06:13 | 01:11:50 | 06:05 +00:08 | 01:11:24 +00:26 |
| Running 6 | 09:32 | 01:18:03 | 08:50 +00:42 | 01:17:29 +00:34 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:57 | 01:27:35 | 03:24 +00:33 | 01:26:19 +01:16 |
| Running 7 | 09:03 | 01:31:32 | 08:58 +00:05 | 01:29:43 +01:49 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 17:39 | 01:40:35 | 11:17 +06:22 | 01:38:41 +01:54 |
| Running 8 | 09:51 | 01:58:14 | 13:15 -03:24 | 01:49:58 +08:16 |
| Wall Balls | 09:02 | 02:08:05 | 14:10 -05:08 | 02:03:13 +04:52 |
| Roxzone | 14:25 | 02:31:23 | 14:00 +00:25 | 02:31:23 |
Harris Katz delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, especially given the competitive nature of the event. Placing 1139th overall and 19th in his age group shows a strong effort, particularly in certain segments where he excelled. His total running time of 01:09:51, which was 02:08 faster than the average, indicates he has a strong running profile. This suggests a need to focus more on strength-based segments where he can gain significant ground. His pacing analysis shows he started conservatively, with initial running segments slower than average but picked up the pace in later stages.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cundall Wayne | 2023 Birmingham | 02:31:14 | |
| Miller Scott | 2022 Dallas | 02:31:18 | |
| Sanchez Jorge | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 02:30:56 | |
| 주 혜웅 | 2024 Incheon | 02:31:36 | |
| Poole Richard | 2023 Sydney | 02:31:19 | |
| Katz Harris | 2024 Melbourne | 02:31:23 | |
| Picasales Louwiel | 2024 Singapore | 02:31:33 | |
| Lim Wei Ji | 2024 Singapore | 02:31:43 | |
| Vargas Salas Jhonatan | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 02:31:37 | |
| Mcgettigan Erin | 2023 New York | 02:31:14 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Melbourne | 02:28:38 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
