Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2020 Dallas using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 377 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of Gutzwiller Matthew's race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where Gutzwiller Matthew hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare Gutzwiller Matthew’s performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Gutzwiller Matthew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 09:52. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Push | 07:57 | 12:01 to 04:04 | 80.6% |
| Sled Pull | 01:30 | 08:28 to 06:58 | 15.2% |
| Run Total | 00:21 | 42:15 to 41:54 | 3.5% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 04:45 to 04:41 | 0.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:02 to 04:02 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:08 to 04:08 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:42 to 01:42 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:12 to 04:12 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:24 to 05:24 | 0.0% |
| Gutzwiller Matthew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:54 | 00:00 | 04:23 -00:29 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:02 | 03:54 | 04:27 -00:25 | 04:23 -00:29 |
| Running 2 | 04:27 | 07:56 | 04:50 -00:23 | 08:50 -00:54 |
| Sled Push | 12:01 | 12:23 | 04:12 +07:49 | 13:40 -01:17 |
| Running 3 | 05:52 | 24:24 | 05:26 +00:26 | 17:52 +06:32 |
| Sled Pull | 08:28 | 30:16 | 07:18 +01:10 | 23:18 +06:58 |
| Running 4 | 05:43 | 38:44 | 05:26 +00:17 | 30:36 +08:08 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:08 | 44:27 | 05:04 -00:56 | 36:02 +08:25 |
| Running 5 | 05:44 | 48:35 | 05:32 +00:12 | 41:06 +07:29 |
| Rowing | 04:45 | 54:19 | 04:43 +00:02 | 46:38 +07:41 |
| Running 6 | 05:34 | 59:04 | 05:23 +00:11 | 51:21 +07:43 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:42 | 01:04:38 | 02:33 -00:51 | 56:44 +07:54 |
| Running 7 | 05:26 | 01:06:20 | 05:30 -00:04 | 59:17 +07:03 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:12 | 01:11:46 | 05:43 -01:31 | 01:04:47 +06:59 |
| Running 8 | 05:39 | 01:15:58 | 06:07 -00:28 | 01:10:30 +05:28 |
| Wall Balls | 05:24 | 01:21:37 | 07:42 -02:18 | 01:16:37 +05:00 |
| Roxzone | 04:16 | 01:31:09 | 06:50 -02:34 | 01:31:09 |
Matthew's best running lap was 00:03:54, which was 00:47 faster than the average for his finish time. This suggests that he has good running abilities and should continue to focus on improving his running performance.
To improve his performance in the Sled Push and Sled Pull, Matthew should focus on building his overall strength and power. Incorporating exercises such as squats, deadlifts, and lunges into his training routine will help him develop the necessary strength for these segments. Additionally, he should work on improving his technique and form for these movements to maximize efficiency.
Specific training strategies for the Sled Push and Sled Pull include:
1. Strength Training: Incorporate exercises such as squats, deadlifts, lunges, and sled pushes/pulls into his training routine to build strength and power in the lower body.
2. Technique and Form: Work with a coach or trainer to ensure proper technique and form during the Sled Push and Sled Pull. This will help maximize efficiency and minimize time wasted.
3. Interval Training: Incorporate interval training sessions that mimic the demands of the Sled Push and Sled Pull. This can include short bursts of intense pushing or pulling followed by periods of rest or lower intensity exercise.
In conclusion, Matthew Gutzwiller had a strong performance in the 2020 Dallas Hyrox race. While he showed strengths in running and overall fitness, there is room for improvement in the Sled Push and Sled Pull segments. By focusing on strength training, technique improvement, and incorporating specific drills and exercises, Matthew can continue to enhance his performance in these areas. Additionally, considering his pacing and maintaining a balanced training approach will contribute to his overall success in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Stables Liam | 2023 Glasgow | 01:31:10 | |
| Chaber Tomasz | 2024 Katowice | 01:30:59 | |
| Teboul Jeremy | 2024 Paris | 01:30:46 | |
| Pfefferer Johann | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:31:24 | |
| Hernández Rodríguez Daniel | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:31:07 | |
| Werther Kai | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:31:12 | |
| Nguyen Viet | 2024 Melbourne | 01:31:33 | |
| Deisenberger Thomas | 2023 Wien | 01:31:25 | |
| Steinle Stefan | 2022 München | 01:31:09 | |
| Fuller Jacob | 2024 Maastricht | 01:30:39 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
