Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2019 Wien using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Nandor Gerczuj's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Nandor Gerczuj's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Nandor Gerczuj's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Nandor Gerczuj's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:33. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 02:50 | 07:05 to 04:15 | 43.3% |
| Sled Push | 01:48 | 04:16 to 02:28 | 27.5% |
| Run Total | 01:41 | 41:07 to 39:26 | 25.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:12 | 04:28 to 04:16 | 3.1% |
| Wall Balls | 00:02 | 05:32 to 05:30 | 0.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:05 to 04:05 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:38 to 01:38 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:04 to 04:04 | 0.0% |
| Nandor Gerczuj | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:30 | 00:00 | 04:26 -00:56 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:28 | 03:30 | 04:22 +00:06 | 04:26 -00:56 |
| Running 2 | 04:37 | 07:58 | 04:46 -00:09 | 08:48 -00:50 |
| Sled Push | 04:16 | 12:35 | 02:45 +01:31 | 13:34 -00:59 |
| Running 3 | 05:25 | 16:51 | 05:09 +00:16 | 16:19 +00:32 |
| Sled Pull | 07:05 | 22:16 | 04:38 +02:27 | 21:28 +00:48 |
| Running 4 | 05:29 | 29:21 | 05:07 +00:22 | 26:06 +03:15 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:05 | 34:50 | 04:57 -00:52 | 31:13 +03:37 |
| Running 5 | 05:25 | 38:55 | 05:16 +00:09 | 36:10 +02:45 |
| Rowing | 04:25 | 44:20 | 04:42 -00:17 | 41:26 +02:54 |
| Running 6 | 05:26 | 48:45 | 05:09 +00:17 | 46:08 +02:37 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:38 | 54:11 | 02:04 -00:26 | 51:17 +02:54 |
| Running 7 | 05:15 | 55:49 | 05:08 +00:07 | 53:21 +02:28 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:04 | 01:01:04 | 04:48 -00:44 | 58:29 +02:35 |
| Running 8 | 06:04 | 01:05:08 | 05:38 +00:26 | 01:03:17 +01:51 |
| Wall Balls | 05:32 | 01:11:12 | 06:02 -00:30 | 01:08:55 +02:17 |
| Roxzone | 04:39 | 01:21:15 | 06:18 -01:39 | 01:21:15 |
Pacing and Profile Analysis:
In terms of pacing, Nandor showed good consistency throughout the race. He maintained a steady pace in most segments, with some segments being faster or slower than average. This suggests that he has a balanced approach to the race and is able to maintain a consistent effort level.
Nandor's total running time of 00:41:07 was 01:56 slower than average. This indicates that he may benefit from focusing more on his running training to improve his overall running performance. Additionally, his Roxzone time of 00:04:39 was 01:24 faster than average, indicating that he managed his transitions efficiently.
Overall, with targeted training and a strategic approach to the race, Nandor has the potential to further improve his performance and achieve even better results in future HYROX races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ten Voorde Christiaan | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:20:46 | |
| Flint Malcolm | 2023 London | 01:21:38 | |
| Plews Andrew Andrew Plews | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:21:06 | |
| Lis Marek | 2023 Warschau | 01:21:03 | |
| Finn Kevin | 2019 New York | 01:21:34 | |
| Ellis Ben | 2024 Birmingham | 01:21:20 | |
| Paini Simon | 2023 Melbourne | 01:21:13 | |
| Samylkin Alex | 2023 Chicago | 01:20:57 | |
| Klauz Peter | 2024 Perth | 01:21:29 | |
| Van Duijn Joey | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:20:45 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
