Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 599 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcconnell Luke's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcconnell Luke's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcconnell Luke's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcconnell Luke's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:00. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:21 | 09:25 to 07:04 | 47.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:17 | 08:58 to 07:41 | 25.7% |
| Run Total | 00:43 | 53:46 to 53:03 | 14.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:39 | 07:22 to 06:43 | 13.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:48 to 04:48 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:46 to 03:46 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:15 to 05:15 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:50 to 02:50 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 08:52 to 08:52 | 0.0% |
| Mcconnell Luke | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:29 | 00:00 | 05:33 -00:04 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:48 | 05:29 | 04:51 -00:03 | 05:33 -00:04 |
| Running 2 | 05:32 | 10:17 | 06:11 -00:39 | 10:24 -00:07 |
| Sled Push | 03:46 | 15:49 | 03:50 -00:04 | 16:35 -00:46 |
| Running 3 | 10:09 | 19:35 | 06:57 +03:12 | 20:25 -00:50 |
| Sled Pull | 07:22 | 29:44 | 06:46 +00:36 | 27:22 +02:22 |
| Running 4 | 06:00 | 37:06 | 06:55 -00:55 | 34:08 +02:58 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:58 | 43:06 | 07:51 +01:07 | 41:03 +02:03 |
| Running 5 | 06:22 | 52:04 | 07:17 -00:55 | 48:54 +03:10 |
| Rowing | 05:15 | 58:26 | 05:24 -00:09 | 56:11 +02:15 |
| Running 6 | 06:05 | 01:03:41 | 06:58 -00:53 | 01:01:35 +02:06 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:50 | 01:09:46 | 02:50 +00:00 | 01:08:33 +01:13 |
| Running 7 | 06:09 | 01:12:36 | 07:01 -00:52 | 01:11:23 +01:13 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 09:25 | 01:18:45 | 07:22 +02:03 | 01:18:24 +00:21 |
| Running 8 | 08:03 | 01:28:10 | 08:39 -00:36 | 01:25:46 +02:24 |
| Wall Balls | 08:52 | 01:36:13 | 09:38 -00:46 | 01:34:25 +01:48 |
| Roxzone | 09:20 | 01:54:17 | 10:14 -00:54 | 01:54:17 |
Luke Mcconnell's performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race was solid, placing him in the top 58% overall and the top 59% within his age group. His total running time was notably faster than average, indicating a strong running profile. However, his performance in strength and hybrid exercises indicates room for improvement. Luke's pacing suggests he started conservatively, with a slower initial running segment but gained momentum as the race progressed, excelling in running segments 2, 4, 5, 6, and 7. This indicates a capacity for endurance but suggests he may benefit from strategies to maintain this momentum throughout strength-based segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Palmer Chris | 2024 Melbourne | 01:54:30 | |
| Mller Marcel | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:54:38 | |
| Ferger Michael | 2023 Hamburg | 01:54:39 | |
| Lavery Scott | 2024 Rimini | 01:54:17 | |
| Benning Timothy | 2022 Birmingham | 01:53:56 | |
| Saeed Nabil | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:54:15 | |
| Herrera Guillermo | 2023 Chicago | 01:54:44 | |
| Peyroux Maxime | 2023 Paris | 01:54:32 | |
| Annecchini Giorgio | 2023 London | 01:54:15 | |
| Meulenhoff Ferry | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:54:01 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Melbourne | 01:26:15 | |
| 2024 Brisbane | 02:01:26 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
