Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 737 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Griffiths Kerri Lee's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Griffiths Kerri Lee's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Griffiths Kerri Lee's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Griffiths Kerri Lee's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:01. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:19 | 07:52 to 06:33 | 32.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:19 | 06:53 to 05:34 | 32.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:43 | 08:04 to 07:21 | 17.8% |
| Run Total | 00:29 | 51:29 to 51:00 | 12.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:11 | 02:40 to 02:29 | 4.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:53 to 04:53 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:50 to 01:50 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:34 to 05:34 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:08 to 05:08 | 0.0% |
| Griffiths Kerri Lee | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:43 | 00:00 | 05:37 +00:06 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:53 | 05:43 | 05:22 -00:29 | 05:37 +00:06 |
| Running 2 | 05:52 | 10:36 | 06:09 -00:17 | 10:59 -00:23 |
| Sled Push | 01:50 | 16:28 | 03:07 -01:17 | 17:08 -00:40 |
| Running 3 | 06:15 | 18:18 | 06:30 -00:15 | 20:15 -01:57 |
| Sled Pull | 07:52 | 24:33 | 06:47 +01:05 | 26:45 -02:12 |
| Running 4 | 06:31 | 32:25 | 06:33 -00:02 | 33:32 -01:07 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:04 | 38:56 | 07:35 +00:29 | 40:05 -01:09 |
| Running 5 | 06:47 | 47:00 | 06:44 +00:03 | 47:40 -00:40 |
| Rowing | 05:34 | 53:47 | 05:42 -00:08 | 54:24 -00:37 |
| Running 6 | 06:33 | 59:21 | 06:36 -00:03 | 01:00:06 -00:45 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:40 | 01:05:54 | 02:31 +00:09 | 01:06:42 -00:48 |
| Running 7 | 06:26 | 01:08:34 | 06:37 -00:11 | 01:09:13 -00:39 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:53 | 01:15:00 | 05:41 +01:12 | 01:15:50 -00:50 |
| Running 8 | 07:26 | 01:21:53 | 07:14 +00:12 | 01:21:31 +00:22 |
| Wall Balls | 05:08 | 01:29:19 | 06:09 -01:01 | 01:28:45 +00:34 |
| Roxzone | 09:00 | 01:43:18 | 08:24 +00:36 | 01:43:18 |
Kerri Lee Griffiths delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, finishing in the top 28% overall and the top 24% in her age group. Her total running time was notably faster than the average by 01:28, indicating a strong running capability. Her running laps were consistently faster than average, suggesting a runner's profile with potential for further improvement in strength-based exercises. The analysis of her initial running segments (Running 1 to Running 4) shows a relatively steady pace, without starting too fast or too slow, which is ideal for endurance events like Hyrox.
The Sled Pull was a significant challenge, with substantial time lost compared to the average. Improving upper body strength and grip endurance is crucial.
Time spent in the Roxzone was longer than average, indicating room for improvement in transitions.
Sandbag lunges were another area of time loss. Building leg strength and endurance is essential.
Improving explosive power and endurance can enhance performance in this segment.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Charles Veronique | 2024 Dallas | 01:43:37 | |
| Guidi Eva | 2023 London | 01:42:56 | |
| Brown Lorna | 2022 Manchester | 01:43:02 | |
| Ong Linda | 2024 Singapore | 01:43:25 | |
| Brennan Fiona | 2024 Malaga | 01:43:15 | |
| Stone Nina | 2023 Houston | 01:43:44 | |
| Druschke Beate | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:42:57 | |
| Heinz Stefanie | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:42:53 | |
| Mcgowan Megan | 2022 Birmingham | 01:43:20 | |
| Hennigan Angela | 2023 Dublin | 01:42:55 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
