Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Dallas using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ness Kyle's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ness Kyle's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ness Kyle's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ness Kyle's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 09:46. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 08:11 | 48:29 to 40:18 | 83.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:29 | 06:10 to 04:41 | 15.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:06 | 04:41 to 04:35 | 1.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 03:57 to 03:57 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:03 to 02:03 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:57 to 03:57 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:21 to 04:21 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:38 to 01:38 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 02:32 to 02:32 | 0.0% |
| Ness Kyle | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:47 | 00:00 | 04:29 +00:18 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:57 | 04:47 | 04:24 -00:27 | 04:29 +00:18 |
| Running 2 | 05:17 | 08:44 | 04:50 +00:27 | 08:53 -00:09 |
| Sled Push | 02:03 | 14:01 | 02:49 -00:46 | 13:43 +00:18 |
| Running 3 | 05:51 | 16:04 | 05:13 +00:38 | 16:32 -00:28 |
| Sled Pull | 03:57 | 21:55 | 04:43 -00:46 | 21:45 +00:10 |
| Running 4 | 06:06 | 25:52 | 05:11 +00:55 | 26:28 -00:36 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:10 | 31:58 | 05:00 +01:10 | 31:39 +00:19 |
| Running 5 | 06:28 | 38:08 | 05:21 +01:07 | 36:39 +01:29 |
| Rowing | 04:21 | 44:36 | 04:44 -00:23 | 42:00 +02:36 |
| Running 6 | 06:24 | 48:57 | 05:14 +01:10 | 46:44 +02:13 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:38 | 55:21 | 02:07 -00:29 | 51:58 +03:23 |
| Running 7 | 06:25 | 56:59 | 05:12 +01:13 | 54:05 +02:54 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:41 | 01:03:24 | 04:51 -00:10 | 59:17 +04:07 |
| Running 8 | 07:16 | 01:08:05 | 05:43 +01:33 | 01:04:08 +03:57 |
| Wall Balls | 02:32 | 01:15:21 | 06:12 -03:40 | 01:09:51 +05:30 |
| Roxzone | 04:45 | 01:22:28 | 06:25 -01:40 | 01:22:28 |
Kyle's total running time of 00:48:29 was 09:00 slower than the average, indicating that he could benefit from improving his running fitness. While his best running lap was 00:04:47, which was only 00:27 slower than average, he consistently lost time in each running segment, indicating a need for improvement in this area.
In conclusion, Kyle Ness performed well in the 2023 Dallas Hyrox race, but there are areas where he can make improvements to enhance his performance. By focusing on improving his running fitness, addressing the segments where he lost the most time, and implementing effective race strategies, Kyle can continue to excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Whyte Peter | 2023 Dublin | 01:22:48 | |
| Kight Jonathan | 2022 Dallas | 01:22:03 | |
| Jucha Maxime | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:22:05 | |
| Pergolini Federico | 2023 Rimini | 01:22:44 | |
| Ntalos Jannis | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:22:21 | |
| Sullivan Jeremiah | 2024 Melbourne | 01:21:58 | |
| Levy Benjamin | 2024 New York | 01:22:39 | |
| Dennis Braeden | 2024 Melbourne | 01:22:05 | |
| Pasquier Benoit | 2024 Paris | 01:22:37 | |
| Neville Wilf | 2024 London | 01:22:20 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Houston | 01:24:52 | |
| 2024 Dallas | 01:18:10 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
