Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2019 Leipzig using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 160 similar athletes.
Compare With Another Athlete
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this performance we identified a possible improvement of 03:38. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:24 (From 36:50 to 35:26) | 38.5% |
| Wall Balls | 01:07 (From 03:57 to 02:50) | 30.7% |
| BBJ | 00:33 (From 04:09 to 03:36) | 15.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:18 (From 04:46 to 04:28) | 8.3% |
| Rowing | 00:16 (From 04:58 to 04:42) | 7.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 01:01 to 01:01) | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 (From 03:30 to 03:30) | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 01:26 to 01:26) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 03:01 to 03:01) | 0.0% |
| Annika Seefeld | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:53 | 00:00 | 04:05 -00:12 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:46 | 03:53 | 04:39 +00:07 | 04:05 -00:12 |
| Running 2 | 04:29 | 08:39 | 04:13 +00:16 | 08:44 -00:05 |
| Sled Push | 01:01 | 13:08 | 02:08 -01:07 | 12:57 +00:11 |
| Running 3 | 04:41 | 14:09 | 04:29 +00:12 | 15:05 -00:56 |
| Sled Pull | 03:30 | 18:50 | 04:05 -00:35 | 19:34 -00:44 |
| Running 4 | 04:35 | 22:20 | 04:26 +00:09 | 23:39 -01:19 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:09 | 26:55 | 03:57 +00:12 | 28:05 -01:10 |
| Running 5 | 04:54 | 31:04 | 04:31 +00:23 | 32:02 -00:58 |
| Rowing | 04:58 | 35:58 | 04:52 +00:06 | 36:33 -00:35 |
| Running 6 | 04:37 | 40:56 | 04:28 +00:09 | 41:25 -00:29 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:26 | 45:33 | 01:45 -00:19 | 45:53 -00:20 |
| Running 7 | 04:38 | 46:59 | 04:26 +00:12 | 47:38 -00:39 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:01 | 51:37 | 03:18 -00:17 | 52:04 -00:27 |
| Running 8 | 05:08 | 54:38 | 04:40 +00:28 | 55:22 -00:44 |
| Wall Balls | 03:57 | 59:46 | 03:14 +00:43 | 01:00:02 -00:16 |
| Roxzone | 04:15 | 01:07:47 | 04:31 -00:16 | 01:07:47 |
However, there are areas where Annika can further improve her performance. Her total running time of 00:36:50 was 02:29 slower than the average, indicating that she may need to focus on improving her running speed and endurance. Additionally, her best running lap of 00:03:53 was slightly slower than the average, suggesting that she can work on maintaining a faster pace throughout the race.
In conclusion, Annika Seefeld demonstrated exceptional performance in the 2019 Leipzig HYROX race. By focusing on improving specific segments, such as burpees broad jump, running 5, wall balls, and running 2, and implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, she can further enhance her performance in future races. Additionally, paying attention to pacing, transitions, and incorporating strength and running training will contribute to her overall success in the HYROX race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kate Squires | 2024 Dubai | 01:07:34 | |
| Lucinda Izzard | 2024 Glasgow | 01:08:09 | |
| Melanie Carsten | 2023 Birmingham | 01:07:25 | |
| Caroline Vreden | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:08:06 | |
| Jessica Sullivan | 2024 Melbourne | 01:07:49 | |
| Carly Waine | 2023 Glasgow | 01:07:48 | |
| Jordan Bath | 2024 London | 01:07:29 | |
| Jane Heathwood | 2023 Glasgow | 01:08:02 | |
| Lauren Rantala | 2021 Austin | 01:07:35 | |
| Claire Guarino | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:07:20 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2019 New York Annika Seefeld | 01:12:56 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Annika Seefeld
