Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Cahill Declan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Cahill Declan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Cahill Declan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Cahill Declan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:58. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:22 | 45:51 to 42:29 | 67.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:44 | 05:43 to 04:59 | 14.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:22 | 06:39 to 06:17 | 7.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:19 | 02:25 to 02:06 | 6.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:06 | 04:53 to 04:47 | 2.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:05 | 02:53 to 02:48 | 1.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:16 to 04:16 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:03 to 05:03 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:29 to 04:29 | 0.0% |
| Cahill Declan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:15 | 00:00 | 04:42 -00:27 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:16 | 04:15 | 04:29 -00:13 | 04:42 -00:27 |
| Running 2 | 05:19 | 08:31 | 05:02 +00:17 | 09:11 -00:40 |
| Sled Push | 02:53 | 13:50 | 02:58 -00:05 | 14:13 -00:23 |
| Running 3 | 05:25 | 16:43 | 05:30 -00:05 | 17:11 -00:28 |
| Sled Pull | 04:53 | 22:08 | 05:02 -00:09 | 22:41 -00:33 |
| Running 4 | 05:29 | 27:01 | 05:29 +00:00 | 27:43 -00:42 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:03 | 32:30 | 05:30 -00:27 | 33:12 -00:42 |
| Running 5 | 08:38 | 37:33 | 05:40 +02:58 | 38:42 -01:09 |
| Rowing | 04:29 | 46:11 | 04:52 -00:23 | 44:22 +01:49 |
| Running 6 | 05:31 | 50:40 | 05:31 +00:00 | 49:14 +01:26 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:25 | 56:11 | 02:13 +00:12 | 54:45 +01:26 |
| Running 7 | 05:30 | 58:36 | 05:30 +00:00 | 56:58 +01:38 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:43 | 01:04:06 | 05:15 +00:28 | 01:02:28 +01:38 |
| Running 8 | 05:47 | 01:09:49 | 06:09 -00:22 | 01:07:43 +02:06 |
| Wall Balls | 06:39 | 01:15:36 | 06:42 -00:03 | 01:13:52 +01:44 |
| Roxzone | 05:27 | 01:27:36 | 07:02 -01:35 | 01:27:36 |
Pacing and Profile:
Declan Cahill's total running time of 00:45:51 is 03:51 slower than the average. This indicates that he may need to work on his running speed and endurance. It is recommended that he prioritize running training to improve his overall running performance. Additionally, his overall time spent in the roxzone is 01:27 faster than average, indicating that he may have rested more or took more time during the transitions. To improve this segment, he should focus on improving his overall fitness and reducing his transition time.
In conclusion, Declan Cahill performed well in the Hyrox race, but there are areas where he can improve to enhance his overall performance. By focusing on improving his running speed and endurance, reducing transition time, and targeting specific segments for improvement, he can further enhance his performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kraaijeveld Peter | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:27:38 | |
| Naden Charlie | 2024 Gdansk | 01:27:59 | |
| Baker Joe | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:27:40 | |
| Feldhaus Matt | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:27:30 | |
| Gunia Marek | 2024 Katowice | 01:27:11 | |
| Egede Petersen Michael | 2023 Hannover | 01:27:52 | |
| Melendez Guadarrama Sergio | 2024 Mexico City | 01:28:02 | |
| Punselie Jeremy | 2024 Melbourne | 01:27:53 | |
| Canak Davorin | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:27:19 | |
| Baker Simon | 2024 Birmingham | 01:27:53 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 London | 01:23:38 | |
| 2023 London | 01:27:25 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
