Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2019 Karlsruhe using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:04. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:54 (From 43:35 to 38:41) | 96.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 (From 04:21 to 04:14) | 2.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:02 (From 01:53 to 01:51) | 0.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:01 (From 05:20 to 05:19) | 0.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 01:28 to 01:28) | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 (From 02:52 to 02:52) | 0.0% |
| BBJ | 00:00 (From 03:29 to 03:29) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 04:33 to 04:33) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 03:48 to 03:48) | 0.0% |
| Schmidt Birger | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:51 | 00:00 | 04:21 +00:30 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:21 | 04:51 | 04:20 +00:01 | 04:21 +00:30 |
| Running 2 | 04:54 | 09:12 | 04:40 +00:14 | 08:41 +00:31 |
| Sled Push | 01:28 | 14:06 | 02:41 -01:13 | 13:21 +00:45 |
| Running 3 | 05:27 | 15:34 | 05:03 +00:24 | 16:02 -00:28 |
| Sled Pull | 02:52 | 21:01 | 04:29 -01:37 | 21:05 -00:04 |
| Running 4 | 05:19 | 23:53 | 05:02 +00:17 | 25:34 -01:41 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:29 | 29:12 | 04:45 -01:16 | 30:36 -01:24 |
| Running 5 | 05:34 | 32:41 | 05:11 +00:23 | 35:21 -02:40 |
| Rowing | 04:33 | 38:15 | 04:40 -00:07 | 40:32 -02:17 |
| Running 6 | 05:24 | 42:48 | 05:03 +00:21 | 45:12 -02:24 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:53 | 48:12 | 02:01 -00:08 | 50:15 -02:03 |
| Running 7 | 05:19 | 50:05 | 05:02 +00:17 | 52:16 -02:11 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:48 | 55:24 | 04:37 -00:49 | 57:18 -01:54 |
| Running 8 | 06:51 | 59:12 | 05:31 +01:20 | 01:01:55 -02:43 |
| Wall Balls | 05:20 | 01:06:03 | 05:49 -00:29 | 01:07:26 -01:23 |
| Roxzone | 08:04 | 01:19:18 | 06:03 +02:01 | 01:19:18 |
Analyzing his splits, we can see that his total running time was 00:43:35, which was 04:55 slower than the average. This indicates that Birger may need to focus more on his running performance to improve his overall race time. However, it is worth noting that he had a strong performance in the Sled Push and Sled Pull segments, where he was significantly faster than the average time.
To improve his performance in these segments, Birger should focus on the following training strategies and techniques:
1. Run Total: Birger's total running time was slower than average. To improve this, he should incorporate more running-specific training into his routine. This can include interval training, hill sprints, and tempo runs. By focusing on his running endurance and speed, Birger can significantly reduce his time in this segment.
2. Roxzone: Birger spent more time than average in the transition zones between exercises. To improve this, he should work on his overall fitness and transition time. Incorporating high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and circuit training can help improve his overall fitness and reduce the time spent in the Roxzone.
3. Running 8: Birger was slower than average in this segment. To enhance his performance, he should focus on increasing his running endurance. Long-distance runs and interval training can help improve his stamina and speed in this segment.
4. Best Lap: Although Birger had a solid performance in his best lap, he can further improve by incorporating speed drills and interval training. By focusing on short bursts of high-intensity running, he can improve his overall speed and performance in this segment.
5. Running 1, Running 5, Running 3, Running 6, Running 7, Running 2, and Running 4: These running segments were slower than average for Birger. To enhance his running performance in these segments, he should incorporate a combination of endurance training and speed work. This can include interval training, hill repeats, and tempo runs.
In conclusion, Birger Schmidt had a strong performance in the 2019 Karlsruhe Hyrox race. While he showed strength in certain segments, there is room for improvement in his running performance and transition time. By incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, focusing on his weaknesses, and implementing effective race strategies, Birger can further enhance his performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wenzel Gregor | 2023 Hamburg | 01:19:46 | |
| Page Elliot | 2024 Madrid | 01:19:00 | |
| Kitchen Michael | 2024 Dublin | 01:19:13 | |
| Van Der Louw Pim | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:19:14 | |
| Labach Jonathan | 2023 Dallas | 01:19:08 | |
| Kotte Thomas | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:19:36 | |
| Kasanngali Kevin | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:19:18 | |
| Antherieu Mathis | 2024 Marseille | 01:18:50 | |
| Campoy Luis | 2024 Madrid | 01:18:51 | |
| Dillon Zeb | 2024 Sydney | 01:18:55 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2018 Stuttgart Schmidt Birger | 01:18:15 | |
| 2019 Hamburg Schmidt Birger | 01:17:28 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Schmidt Birger
