Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 417 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Nägler Guido's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Nägler Guido's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Nägler Guido's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Nägler Guido's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:26. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:54 | 44:16 to 41:22 | 65.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:01 | 05:48 to 04:47 | 22.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:12 | 04:29 to 04:17 | 4.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:12 | 07:30 to 07:18 | 4.5% |
| Rowing | 00:07 | 04:46 to 04:39 | 2.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:32 to 03:32 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:44 to 05:44 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:52 to 01:52 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:25 to 05:25 | 0.0% |
| Nägler Guido | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:52 | 00:00 | 04:16 -00:24 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:29 | 03:52 | 04:17 +00:12 | 04:16 -00:24 |
| Running 2 | 05:24 | 08:21 | 04:45 +00:39 | 08:33 -00:12 |
| Sled Push | 03:32 | 13:45 | 04:02 -00:30 | 13:18 +00:27 |
| Running 3 | 05:38 | 17:17 | 05:17 +00:21 | 17:20 -00:03 |
| Sled Pull | 05:44 | 22:55 | 07:17 -01:33 | 22:37 +00:18 |
| Running 4 | 05:45 | 28:39 | 05:19 +00:26 | 29:54 -01:15 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:48 | 34:24 | 04:55 +00:53 | 35:13 -00:49 |
| Running 5 | 05:52 | 40:12 | 05:26 +00:26 | 40:08 +00:04 |
| Rowing | 04:46 | 46:04 | 04:40 +00:06 | 45:34 +00:30 |
| Running 6 | 05:48 | 50:50 | 05:19 +00:29 | 50:14 +00:36 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:52 | 56:38 | 02:31 -00:39 | 55:33 +01:05 |
| Running 7 | 05:54 | 58:30 | 05:25 +00:29 | 58:04 +00:26 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:25 | 01:04:24 | 05:40 -00:15 | 01:03:29 +00:55 |
| Running 8 | 06:05 | 01:09:49 | 06:04 +00:01 | 01:09:09 +00:40 |
| Wall Balls | 07:30 | 01:15:54 | 07:36 -00:06 | 01:15:13 +00:41 |
| Roxzone | 06:08 | 01:29:26 | 06:37 -00:29 | 01:29:26 |
Guido Nägler delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, securing an overall rank of 234 out of 402 athletes, and an impressive 2nd place in his age group. This places him in the top 58% overall and top 66% in his age category. His overall time was 01:29:26. Despite being slower than average by 02:03 in his total running time, Guido showcased notable strength in exercises, particularly in the Sled Push and Sled Pull, indicating a stronger leaning towards strength-based activities rather than running. The running segments suggest that Guido started too fast, as evidenced by his first running segment, which was 00:20 faster than average, but gradually slowed down across subsequent runs. His performance in the Roxzone also indicates efficient transitions.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Farinelli Maurizio | 2023 Rimini | 01:29:50 | |
| Weis Christopher | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:29:51 | |
| ONeill Rohin | 2024 Glasgow | 01:29:07 | |
| Mantiri Gary | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:29:16 | |
| Upshaw Justin | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:29:39 | |
| Romero Carlos | 2023 Malaga | 01:29:23 | |
| CAIN LAWRENCE | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:29:26 | |
| Mcneil Tony | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:29:24 | |
| Farzad Dariush | 2022 New York | 01:29:24 | |
| Latapie Maximilien | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:29:04 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2019 Oberhausen | 01:20:10 | |
| 2022 Essen | 01:49:14 | |
| 2022 Essen | 01:48:02 | |
| 2019 Essen | 01:17:57 | |
| 2018 Essen | 01:32:18 | |
| 2019 Hannover | 01:23:41 | |
| 2022 München | 01:42:07 | |
| WorldChampionship - Leipzig | 01:41:24 | |
| 2024 Stuttgart | 01:42:25 | |
| 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:39:54 | |
| 2024 Köln | 01:50:58 | |
| 2023 World Championships Manchester | 01:43:55 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
