Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Perth using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Paterson Lars's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Paterson Lars's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Paterson Lars's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Paterson Lars's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:41. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:57 | 47:24 to 45:27 | 52.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:38 | 07:32 to 05:54 | 44.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:04 | 02:23 to 02:19 | 1.8% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 04:59 to 04:57 | 0.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:30 to 04:30 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:53 to 02:53 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:07 to 03:07 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:38 to 05:38 | 0.0% |
| Paterson Lars | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:49 | 00:00 | 04:56 +00:53 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:30 | 05:49 | 04:34 -00:04 | 04:56 +00:53 |
| Running 2 | 05:16 | 10:19 | 05:23 -00:07 | 09:30 +00:49 |
| Sled Push | 02:53 | 15:35 | 03:11 -00:18 | 14:53 +00:42 |
| Running 3 | 05:37 | 18:28 | 05:53 -00:16 | 18:04 +00:24 |
| Sled Pull | 03:07 | 24:05 | 05:31 -02:24 | 23:57 +00:08 |
| Running 4 | 05:36 | 27:12 | 05:52 -00:16 | 29:28 -02:16 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:32 | 32:48 | 06:09 +01:23 | 35:20 -02:32 |
| Running 5 | 06:06 | 40:20 | 06:04 +00:02 | 41:29 -01:09 |
| Rowing | 04:59 | 46:26 | 05:01 -00:02 | 47:33 -01:07 |
| Running 6 | 06:08 | 51:25 | 05:54 +00:14 | 52:34 -01:09 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:23 | 57:33 | 02:24 -00:01 | 58:28 -00:55 |
| Running 7 | 05:50 | 59:56 | 05:53 -00:03 | 01:00:52 -00:56 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:38 | 01:05:46 | 05:46 -01:08 | 01:06:45 -00:59 |
| Running 8 | 07:06 | 01:10:24 | 06:44 +00:22 | 01:12:31 -02:07 |
| Wall Balls | 05:38 | 01:17:30 | 07:25 -01:47 | 01:19:15 -01:45 |
| Roxzone | 11:40 | 01:34:39 | 07:59 +03:41 | 01:34:39 |
Lars Paterson's performance in the 2024 Perth Hyrox race demonstrated strengths in specific strength-based exercises, particularly the Sled Pull and Sandbag Lunges, where he achieved top percentile rankings. However, his overall running time was slower than average by 22 seconds, indicating a need for improvement in his running performance. The Roxzone transitions were significantly slower than average, suggesting that optimizing transition times could greatly enhance his overall race outcome. Lars appears to have a hybrid profile with notable strength elements, but his running could benefit from further development. His start was slower in the initial running segments, indicating a conservative pacing strategy that may have left room for improvement in his early race speed.
By focusing on these key areas, Lars can enhance his performance in future races, leveraging his strengths while addressing areas needing improvement for a more balanced and competitive race strategy.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cuffe Robert | 2023 Manchester | 01:34:39 | |
| Kneece Matt | 2021 Los Angeles | 01:34:56 | |
| Núñez Veiga Andrés | 2024 Dublin | 01:34:10 | |
| Scott Stanley | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:34:32 | |
| Couceiro Ariel | 2024 Melbourne | 01:34:22 | |
| Hugeri Marco | 2023 Wien | 01:34:59 | |
| Murphy Glenn | 2024 Singapore | 01:34:42 | |
| Tomlinson David | 2023 Birmingham | 01:34:56 | |
| Krug Raphael | 2022 Maastricht | 01:34:34 | |
| Finnigan Jonathan | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:35:03 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
