Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2019 Nürnberg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Meckel Marco's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Meckel Marco's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Meckel Marco's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Meckel Marco's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:53. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:58 | 09:34 to 06:36 | 76.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:33 | 06:02 to 05:29 | 14.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:14 | 04:43 to 04:29 | 6.0% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 04:55 to 04:51 | 1.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:04 | 02:15 to 02:11 | 1.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:05 to 02:05 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:13 to 04:13 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 42:38 to 42:38 | 0.0% |
| Meckel Marco | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:23 | 00:00 | 04:47 -00:24 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:43 | 04:23 | 04:31 +00:12 | 04:47 -00:24 |
| Running 2 | 05:00 | 09:06 | 05:08 -00:08 | 09:18 -00:12 |
| Sled Push | 02:05 | 14:06 | 03:03 -00:58 | 14:26 -00:20 |
| Running 3 | 05:23 | 16:11 | 05:37 -00:14 | 17:29 -01:18 |
| Sled Pull | 04:13 | 21:34 | 05:13 -01:00 | 23:06 -01:32 |
| Running 4 | 05:23 | 25:47 | 05:36 -00:13 | 28:19 -02:32 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:02 | 31:10 | 05:43 +00:19 | 33:55 -02:45 |
| Running 5 | 05:26 | 37:12 | 05:47 -00:21 | 39:38 -02:26 |
| Rowing | 04:55 | 42:38 | 04:54 +00:01 | 45:25 -02:47 |
| Running 6 | 05:15 | 47:33 | 05:37 -00:22 | 50:19 -02:46 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:15 | 52:48 | 02:17 -00:02 | 55:56 -03:08 |
| Running 7 | 05:02 | 55:03 | 05:36 -00:34 | 58:13 -03:10 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:47 | 01:00:05 | 05:26 -00:39 | 01:03:49 -03:44 |
| Running 8 | 06:49 | 01:04:52 | 06:17 +00:32 | 01:09:15 -04:23 |
| Wall Balls | 09:34 | 01:11:41 | 06:56 +02:38 | 01:15:32 -03:51 |
| Roxzone | 08:44 | 01:29:52 | 07:24 +01:20 | 01:29:52 |
Marco's best running lap was 00:04:23, which was 14 seconds faster than the average. This suggests that he has a strong running ability and is able to maintain a good pace throughout the race. His splits in the running segments consistently showed him performing faster than the average, indicating his strength in this area.
Additionally, Marco should consider incorporating specific training sessions that target the segments where he lost the most time. This could include dedicating a portion of his training sessions to practicing Wall Balls, Burpees Broad Jump, and Ski Erg exercises. By focusing on these specific areas, he can improve his performance and reduce the time lost in these segments.
Overall, Marco Meckel had a strong performance in the 2019 Nürnberg Hyrox race. By focusing on the identified areas of improvement and implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, he can further enhance his performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wallace Antonio | 2024 Katowice | 01:30:08 | |
| Darby Michael | 2023 Stockholm | 01:30:06 | |
| Odonnell Daniel | 2022 Manchester | 01:29:40 | |
| Walshe Daragh | 2024 Malaga | 01:29:30 | |
| Eden Keno | 2023 Hamburg | 01:29:47 | |
| Edney Grant | 2024 Birmingham | 01:29:45 | |
| Bonnaud Antoine | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:30:21 | |
| Porter Stephen | 2024 Manchester | 01:30:17 | |
| Manders Yurien | 2024 Maastricht | 01:30:19 | |
| Van Den Bleeken Quinten | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:29:22 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
