Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Marsh Nathan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Marsh Nathan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Marsh Nathan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Marsh Nathan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:00 | 06:44 to 04:44 | 36.4% |
| Wall Balls | 01:16 | 07:11 to 05:55 | 23.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:01 | 05:54 to 04:53 | 18.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:29 | 05:02 to 04:33 | 8.8% |
| Rowing | 00:20 | 05:02 to 04:42 | 6.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:13 | 02:14 to 02:01 | 3.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:11 | 04:32 to 04:21 | 3.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:16 to 02:16 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 39:16 to 39:16 | 0.0% |
| Marsh Nathan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:14 | 00:00 | 04:34 -00:20 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:32 | 04:14 | 04:25 +00:07 | 04:34 -00:20 |
| Running 2 | 04:28 | 08:46 | 04:53 -00:25 | 08:59 -00:13 |
| Sled Push | 02:16 | 13:14 | 02:52 -00:36 | 13:52 -00:38 |
| Running 3 | 04:47 | 15:30 | 05:20 -00:33 | 16:44 -01:14 |
| Sled Pull | 05:02 | 20:17 | 04:51 +00:11 | 22:04 -01:47 |
| Running 4 | 04:47 | 25:19 | 05:18 -00:31 | 26:55 -01:36 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:54 | 30:06 | 05:12 +00:42 | 32:13 -02:07 |
| Running 5 | 05:07 | 36:00 | 05:28 -00:21 | 37:25 -01:25 |
| Rowing | 05:02 | 41:07 | 04:47 +00:15 | 42:53 -01:46 |
| Running 6 | 04:59 | 46:09 | 05:20 -00:21 | 47:40 -01:31 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:14 | 51:08 | 02:09 +00:05 | 53:00 -01:52 |
| Running 7 | 04:57 | 53:22 | 05:19 -00:22 | 55:09 -01:47 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:44 | 58:19 | 04:59 +01:45 | 01:00:28 -02:09 |
| Running 8 | 06:01 | 01:05:03 | 05:54 +00:07 | 01:05:27 -00:24 |
| Wall Balls | 07:11 | 01:11:04 | 06:19 +00:52 | 01:11:21 -00:17 |
| Roxzone | 06:14 | 01:24:19 | 06:39 -00:25 | 01:24:19 |
Nathan Marsh delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, particularly excelling in his running segments, with a total running time of 39:16, which is 3:10 faster than the average for his category. This indicates a strong running profile, suggesting that Nathan's strengths lie in his running abilities rather than in strength-based exercises. His pacing was well-executed in the initial running segments, allowing him to remain consistently faster than the average. However, the later running segments saw a slight decline, indicating potential fatigue from strength exercises. Overall, Nathan ranks in the top 27% of all athletes and top 30% in his age group, showcasing a competitive edge primarily in running.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Owens Steven | 2023 Houston | 01:24:44 | |
| Henderson Cameron | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:24:25 | |
| Van Heerwaarden Alex | 2024 Melbourne | 01:24:20 | |
| Goffage Daniel | 2024 Perth | 01:24:45 | |
| Bayer Daniel | 2022 Leipzig | 01:24:42 | |
| Mushtaq Cheraz | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:24:08 | |
| Dowd Ethan | 2024 Melbourne | 01:23:54 | |
| Lindley Joseph | 2021 Austin | 01:24:33 | |
| Cheung Eddie | 2022 London | 01:24:32 | |
| Redemann Matthias | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:24:02 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Melbourne | 01:20:06 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
