Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2018 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 432 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ziemann Timo's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ziemann Timo's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ziemann Timo's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ziemann Timo's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:03. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:28 | 42:29 to 41:01 | 36.2% |
| Sled Pull | 01:15 | 07:55 to 06:40 | 30.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:39 | 03:03 to 02:24 | 16.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:32 | 05:14 to 04:42 | 13.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 04:24 to 04:16 | 3.3% |
| Rowing | 00:01 | 04:39 to 04:38 | 0.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:59 to 02:59 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:51 to 04:51 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:23 to 05:23 | 0.0% |
| Ziemann Timo | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:01 | 00:00 | 04:19 -00:18 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:24 | 04:01 | 04:17 +00:07 | 04:19 -00:18 |
| Running 2 | 05:06 | 08:25 | 04:45 +00:21 | 08:36 -00:11 |
| Sled Push | 02:59 | 13:31 | 04:00 -01:01 | 13:21 +00:10 |
| Running 3 | 05:09 | 16:30 | 05:17 -00:08 | 17:21 -00:51 |
| Sled Pull | 07:55 | 21:39 | 07:09 +00:46 | 22:38 -00:59 |
| Running 4 | 05:16 | 29:34 | 05:14 +00:02 | 29:47 -00:13 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:14 | 34:50 | 04:50 +00:24 | 35:01 -00:11 |
| Running 5 | 05:35 | 40:04 | 05:24 +00:11 | 39:51 +00:13 |
| Rowing | 04:39 | 45:39 | 04:40 -00:01 | 45:15 +00:24 |
| Running 6 | 05:40 | 50:18 | 05:15 +00:25 | 49:55 +00:23 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:03 | 55:58 | 02:29 +00:34 | 55:10 +00:48 |
| Running 7 | 05:37 | 59:01 | 05:20 +00:17 | 57:39 +01:22 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:51 | 01:04:38 | 05:35 -00:44 | 01:02:59 +01:39 |
| Running 8 | 06:08 | 01:09:29 | 05:54 +00:14 | 01:08:34 +00:55 |
| Wall Balls | 05:23 | 01:15:37 | 07:35 -02:12 | 01:14:28 +01:09 |
| Roxzone | 07:40 | 01:28:40 | 06:37 +01:03 | 01:28:40 |
Based on his splits analysis, Timo's running performance was generally strong, with his total running time of 00:42:29 being only 18 seconds slower than the average. This suggests that he has a solid running profile and should focus on maintaining and improving his running abilities. His best running lap of 00:04:01 was particularly impressive, being 32 seconds faster than average.
Overall, Timo Ziemann had a strong performance in the Hyrox race in Hamburg. While there are areas for improvement, particularly in the Sled Pull, Farmers Carry, Roxzone, and overall running performance, he has shown great potential and can make significant improvements with targeted training strategies and techniques. By focusing on strength training, form correction, and specific exercises for each segment, Timo can enhance his performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Baron André | 2024 London | 01:28:46 | |
| Lee Jason | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:28:30 | |
| Capriotti Enrico | 2024 Rimini | 01:28:35 | |
| Magalogo Raymond | 2024 Brisbane | 01:28:22 | |
| Alvarez Ortn Axel | 2023 Bilbao | 01:28:27 | |
| Alkiewicz Stefan | 2018 Hamburg | 01:29:01 | |
| König Marcus | 2019 Leipzig | 01:28:47 | |
| Miegel Marc | 2018 Hamburg | 01:29:00 | |
| Altun Ugur | 2023 Dubai | 01:29:07 | |
| Fearn Gordon | 2021 Birmingham | 01:28:18 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Hamburg | 01:39:39 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
