Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2018 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 369 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Krützelmann Kevin's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Krützelmann Kevin's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Krützelmann Kevin's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Krützelmann Kevin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:01. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:50 | 43:24 to 41:34 | 36.5% |
| Wall Balls | 01:27 | 08:49 to 07:22 | 28.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:46 | 07:37 to 06:51 | 15.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:42 | 05:31 to 04:49 | 14.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:11 | 04:29 to 04:18 | 3.7% |
| Rowing | 00:05 | 04:45 to 04:40 | 1.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:17 to 02:17 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:09 to 02:09 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:59 to 03:59 | 0.0% |
| Krützelmann Kevin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:56 | 00:00 | 04:22 -00:26 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:29 | 03:56 | 04:19 +00:10 | 04:22 -00:26 |
| Running 2 | 04:49 | 08:25 | 04:42 +00:07 | 08:41 -00:16 |
| Sled Push | 02:17 | 13:14 | 04:05 -01:48 | 13:23 -00:09 |
| Running 3 | 05:12 | 15:31 | 05:21 -00:09 | 17:28 -01:57 |
| Sled Pull | 07:37 | 20:43 | 07:25 +00:12 | 22:49 -02:06 |
| Running 4 | 03:31 | 28:20 | 05:20 -01:49 | 30:14 -01:54 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:31 | 31:51 | 04:59 +00:32 | 35:34 -03:43 |
| Running 5 | 08:55 | 37:22 | 05:30 +03:25 | 40:33 -03:11 |
| Rowing | 04:45 | 46:17 | 04:43 +00:02 | 46:03 +00:14 |
| Running 6 | 05:10 | 51:02 | 05:20 -00:10 | 50:46 +00:16 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:09 | 56:12 | 02:32 -00:23 | 56:06 +00:06 |
| Running 7 | 05:20 | 58:21 | 05:24 -00:04 | 58:38 -00:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:59 | 01:03:41 | 05:40 -01:41 | 01:04:02 -00:21 |
| Running 8 | 06:33 | 01:07:40 | 05:59 +00:34 | 01:09:42 -02:02 |
| Wall Balls | 08:49 | 01:14:13 | 07:41 +01:08 | 01:15:41 -01:28 |
| Roxzone | 07:07 | 01:30:09 | 06:47 +00:20 | 01:30:09 |
Kevin's best running lap was 00:03:31, which indicates that he has good speed and endurance. His splits analysis shows that he performed particularly well in Running 1, Running 2, Sled Push, Running 3, Running 4, Farmers Carry, Running 7, Sandbag Lunges, and Running 6. In these segments, he was faster than the average time, showcasing his strength and efficiency.
In terms of race strategy, Kevin should aim to capitalize on his strengths in running and strength exercises. He should push hard in the running segments where he performs well, and maintain a consistent pace in the strength exercises to avoid burnout. It is important for him to stay mentally focused and motivated throughout the race, especially during the challenging segments.
Overall, Kevin Krützelmann has shown great potential in the Hyrox race in Hamburg. With targeted training strategies to improve the identified areas of weakness, he can further enhance his performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lodi Simone | 2024 Rimini | 01:29:57 | |
| Hanenberg Stefan | 2022 Essen | 01:29:48 | |
| Matiatos Denis | 2024 Marseille | 01:30:31 | |
| Mawdesley Harry | 2023 London | 01:30:35 | |
| Wimberger Johannes | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:30:36 | |
| Hentel Jan | 2020 Hannover | 01:30:23 | |
| Ruggieri Alessio | 2024 Milan | 01:30:22 | |
| Aras Jonathan | 2021 Madrid | 01:30:39 | |
| Mcguire Gordon Daniel | 2023 Stockholm | 01:30:32 | |
| Gleiser Ricco | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:30:20 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2021 Hamburg | 01:19:46 | |
| 2022 Hamburg | 01:13:03 | |
| 2020 Hannover | 01:26:42 | |
| 2019 Hamburg | 01:50:44 | |
| 2024 Hamburg | 01:15:02 | |
| 2024 Frankfurt | 01:13:17 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
