Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Sydney using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Pretty Jo's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Pretty Jo's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Pretty Jo's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Pretty Jo's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:24. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:03 | 42:33 to 40:30 | 38.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:17 | 05:57 to 04:40 | 23.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:47 | 05:20 to 04:33 | 14.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:37 | 02:46 to 02:09 | 11.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:29 | 04:21 to 03:52 | 9.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:10 | 04:56 to 04:46 | 3.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:01 | 01:54 to 01:53 | 0.3% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:55 to 04:55 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:32 to 03:32 | 0.0% |
| Pretty Jo | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:56 | 00:00 | 04:40 -00:44 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:56 | 03:56 | 04:56 +00:00 | 04:40 -00:44 |
| Running 2 | 05:02 | 08:52 | 05:01 +00:01 | 09:36 -00:44 |
| Sled Push | 02:46 | 13:54 | 02:31 +00:15 | 14:37 -00:43 |
| Running 3 | 05:30 | 16:40 | 05:17 +00:13 | 17:08 -00:28 |
| Sled Pull | 05:20 | 22:10 | 05:05 +00:15 | 22:25 -00:15 |
| Running 4 | 05:23 | 27:30 | 05:18 +00:05 | 27:30 +00:00 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:57 | 32:53 | 05:12 +00:45 | 32:48 +00:05 |
| Running 5 | 05:37 | 38:50 | 05:25 +00:12 | 38:00 +00:50 |
| Rowing | 04:55 | 44:27 | 05:09 -00:14 | 43:25 +01:02 |
| Running 6 | 05:15 | 49:22 | 05:20 -00:05 | 48:34 +00:48 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:54 | 54:37 | 02:04 -00:10 | 53:54 +00:43 |
| Running 7 | 05:23 | 56:31 | 05:18 +00:05 | 55:58 +00:33 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:21 | 01:01:54 | 04:12 +00:09 | 01:01:16 +00:38 |
| Running 8 | 06:31 | 01:06:15 | 05:34 +00:57 | 01:05:28 +00:47 |
| Wall Balls | 03:32 | 01:12:46 | 04:13 -00:41 | 01:11:02 +01:44 |
| Roxzone | 04:54 | 01:21:04 | 05:49 -00:55 | 01:21:04 |
Jo Pretty delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Sydney Hyrox event, securing an overall rank of 77th and an impressive 11th place within the 40-44 age group. This places her in the top 7% of both her overall category and age group. Her total running time was 00:42:33, which is 17 seconds slower than the average, indicating potential in strength-based exercises. The Roxzone time was significantly faster than average, demonstrating strong transitions and effective recovery. Analysis of the initial running segments suggests that Jo started the race at a strong pace, especially evident in Running 1, where she was 41 seconds faster than average. However, her running performance was not consistently maintained across subsequent segments, suggesting a need for improved endurance and pacing. Overall, Jo exhibits a hybrid profile, with strengths in both running and strength-based exercises, although with room for improvement in longer endurance running.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fürst Alexandra | 2023 Hamburg | 01:20:47 | |
| Lindig Claudia | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:20:36 | |
| Van Alboom Sarah | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:21:01 | |
| Vullings Amy | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:20:38 | |
| Jopp Martyna | 2024 Poznan | 01:20:56 | |
| Whitt Lena | 2024 Houston | 01:21:32 | |
| Dudar Monique | 2023 Dallas | 01:20:48 | |
| Mcnaughton Libby | 2024 Brisbane | 01:21:29 | |
| Langendorf Antje | 2022 Hamburg | 01:21:03 | |
| Chalmers Karen | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:20:39 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
