Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Onclin Sven's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Onclin Sven's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Onclin Sven's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Onclin Sven's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:28. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:08 | 45:47 to 40:39 | 93.9% |
| Wall Balls | 00:13 | 06:01 to 05:48 | 4.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 | 04:27 to 04:20 | 2.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:03 to 02:03 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:16 to 04:16 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:26 to 04:26 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:33 to 04:33 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:54 to 01:54 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:12 to 04:12 | 0.0% |
| Onclin Sven | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:52 | 00:00 | 04:30 -00:38 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:27 | 03:52 | 04:24 +00:03 | 04:30 -00:38 |
| Running 2 | 05:36 | 08:19 | 04:52 +00:44 | 08:54 -00:35 |
| Sled Push | 02:03 | 13:55 | 02:52 -00:49 | 13:46 +00:09 |
| Running 3 | 05:52 | 15:58 | 05:16 +00:36 | 16:38 -00:40 |
| Sled Pull | 04:16 | 21:50 | 04:47 -00:31 | 21:54 -00:04 |
| Running 4 | 05:55 | 26:06 | 05:14 +00:41 | 26:41 -00:35 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:26 | 32:01 | 05:03 -00:37 | 31:55 +00:06 |
| Running 5 | 06:06 | 36:27 | 05:24 +00:42 | 36:58 -00:31 |
| Rowing | 04:33 | 42:33 | 04:45 -00:12 | 42:22 +00:11 |
| Running 6 | 05:50 | 47:06 | 05:16 +00:34 | 47:07 -00:01 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:54 | 52:56 | 02:08 -00:14 | 52:23 +00:33 |
| Running 7 | 05:46 | 54:50 | 05:15 +00:31 | 54:31 +00:19 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:12 | 01:00:36 | 04:55 -00:43 | 59:46 +00:50 |
| Running 8 | 06:54 | 01:04:48 | 05:48 +01:06 | 01:04:41 +00:07 |
| Wall Balls | 06:01 | 01:11:42 | 06:17 -00:16 | 01:10:29 +01:13 |
| Roxzone | 05:39 | 01:23:14 | 06:28 -00:49 | 01:23:14 |
In terms of his splits analysis, Sven showed strength in the Running 1, Sled Push, Sled Pull, Burpees Broad Jump, Farmers Carry, Sandbag Lunges, Wall Balls, and Roxzone segments, where he either performed faster than the average or significantly faster than the average. This indicates solid performance in these areas.
However, there are several areas where improvement is needed. Sven's running times in Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, Running 5, Running 6, Running 7, and Running 8 were slower than the average. This suggests that he should focus on improving his running performance to enhance his overall race time.
In conclusion, Sven Onclin showed a strong overall performance in the HYROX race in Amsterdam. While he excelled in several strength-based segments, there is room for improvement in his running performance. By incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, focusing on pacing, and practicing efficient transitions, Sven can enhance his overall race performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Pirini Martin | 2022 Bremen | 01:23:09 | |
| Mclaughlin Patrick | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:22:56 | |
| Rankin Andre | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:22:52 | |
| Jabri Ibrahim | 2024 Dubai | 01:23:43 | |
| Alvarez Huerta David | 2024 Bilbao | 01:23:38 | |
| Cobb John | 2023 London | 01:23:11 | |
| Calder Christopher | 2024 Paris | 01:23:44 | |
| Hellmann Matthijs | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:23:31 | |
| Ee Wes | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:23:17 | |
| Dow Luke | 2022 Birmingham | 01:23:20 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
