Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Sydney using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Lillas Matt's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Lillas Matt's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Lillas Matt's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Lillas Matt's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:38. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:35 | 36:45 to 34:10 | 45.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:58 | 04:22 to 03:24 | 17.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:38 | 05:00 to 04:22 | 11.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:36 | 04:09 to 03:33 | 10.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:32 | 04:33 to 04:01 | 9.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:09 | 01:42 to 01:33 | 2.7% |
| Rowing | 00:07 | 04:26 to 04:19 | 2.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:03 | 02:00 to 01:57 | 0.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:12 to 03:12 | 0.0% |
| Lillas Matt | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:20 | 00:00 | 03:57 -00:37 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:33 | 03:20 | 04:10 +00:23 | 03:57 -00:37 |
| Running 2 | 04:25 | 07:53 | 04:13 +00:12 | 08:07 -00:14 |
| Sled Push | 02:00 | 12:18 | 02:26 -00:26 | 12:20 -00:02 |
| Running 3 | 04:30 | 14:18 | 04:29 +00:01 | 14:46 -00:28 |
| Sled Pull | 04:22 | 18:48 | 03:54 +00:28 | 19:15 -00:27 |
| Running 4 | 04:41 | 23:10 | 04:29 +00:12 | 23:09 +00:01 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:12 | 27:51 | 03:54 -00:42 | 27:38 +00:13 |
| Running 5 | 04:51 | 31:03 | 04:36 +00:15 | 31:32 -00:29 |
| Rowing | 04:26 | 35:54 | 04:26 +00:00 | 36:08 -00:14 |
| Running 6 | 04:44 | 40:20 | 04:31 +00:13 | 40:34 -00:14 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:42 | 45:04 | 01:47 -00:05 | 45:05 -00:01 |
| Running 7 | 04:37 | 46:46 | 04:31 +00:06 | 46:52 -00:06 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:09 | 51:23 | 03:57 +00:12 | 51:23 +00:00 |
| Running 8 | 05:41 | 55:32 | 04:48 +00:53 | 55:20 +00:12 |
| Wall Balls | 05:00 | 01:01:13 | 04:54 +00:06 | 01:00:08 +01:05 |
| Roxzone | 03:51 | 01:09:56 | 04:54 -01:03 | 01:09:56 |
Matt Lillas delivered an impressive performance at the 2024 Sydney Hyrox event, securing an overall rank of 66 out of 1,059 athletes, placing him in the top 6%. Within his age group (40-44), he ranked 9th, positioning him among the top 5% of 153 athletes. His overall time was 01:09:56, demonstrating a commendable balance of endurance and strength.
Upon reviewing his pacing, it appears Matt started the race slightly too fast in the initial running segment, with Running 1 being significantly faster than average, which may have led to a gradual slowdown in subsequent running segments. His total running time was just 50 seconds slower than average, indicating a strong running profile. However, his strength exercises like the Sled Pull and Wall Balls could use some focus, suggesting a hybrid athlete profile with potential for improvement in certain strength tasks.
With targeted training and strategic adjustments, Matt can enhance his performance in future Hyrox races, turning areas of improvement into strengths and further improving his overall race time.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Magilton Alex | 2023 London | 01:10:23 | |
| Mrabet Zakary | 2024 Paris | 01:10:22 | |
| Bijnen Sander | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:09:44 | |
| Wacker Tim | 2022 Essen | 01:10:04 | |
| Hindhaugh Rory | 2024 Poznan | 01:09:43 | |
| Koehler David | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:09:38 | |
| Pitchford Simon | 2022 Birmingham | 01:10:17 | |
| Sanmiguel Cervera Dario | 2023 Barcelona | 01:10:17 | |
| Matthews William | 2024 Dublin | 01:09:27 | |
| George Matthew | 2024 Birmingham | 01:10:06 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Sydney | 01:16:19 | |
| 2024 Melbourne | 01:10:04 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
