Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Sydney using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 544 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Green Shane's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Green Shane's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Green Shane's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Green Shane's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:37. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:15 | 38:37 to 34:22 | 75.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:26 | 03:48 to 03:22 | 7.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:20 | 04:19 to 03:59 | 5.9% |
| Rowing | 00:14 | 04:31 to 04:17 | 4.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:11 | 01:57 to 01:46 | 3.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:10 | 04:56 to 04:46 | 3.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:01 | 04:05 to 04:04 | 0.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:23 to 02:23 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:01 to 04:01 | 0.0% |
| Green Shane | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:15 | 00:00 | 03:50 -00:35 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:19 | 03:15 | 04:04 +00:15 | 03:50 -00:35 |
| Running 2 | 04:25 | 07:34 | 04:09 +00:16 | 07:54 -00:20 |
| Sled Push | 02:23 | 11:59 | 03:15 -00:52 | 12:03 -00:04 |
| Running 3 | 04:43 | 14:22 | 04:30 +00:13 | 15:18 -00:56 |
| Sled Pull | 04:56 | 19:05 | 05:18 -00:22 | 19:48 -00:43 |
| Running 4 | 04:54 | 24:01 | 04:31 +00:23 | 25:06 -01:05 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:48 | 28:55 | 03:43 +00:05 | 29:37 -00:42 |
| Running 5 | 04:54 | 32:43 | 04:37 +00:17 | 33:20 -00:37 |
| Rowing | 04:31 | 37:37 | 04:20 +00:11 | 37:57 -00:20 |
| Running 6 | 04:50 | 42:08 | 04:31 +00:19 | 42:17 -00:09 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:57 | 46:58 | 01:57 +00:00 | 46:48 +00:10 |
| Running 7 | 05:06 | 48:55 | 04:36 +00:30 | 48:45 +00:10 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:05 | 54:01 | 04:20 -00:15 | 53:21 +00:40 |
| Running 8 | 06:34 | 58:06 | 04:54 +01:40 | 57:41 +00:25 |
| Wall Balls | 04:01 | 01:04:40 | 05:49 -01:48 | 01:02:35 +02:05 |
| Roxzone | 04:48 | 01:13:21 | 04:57 -00:09 | 01:13:21 |
Shane Green delivered a commendable overall performance in the 2024 Sydney HYROX PRO race, securing a 37th place finish out of 179 athletes, placing him in the top 20%. Within his age group (45-49), he impressively ranked 2nd, showcasing his competitive edge among peers. Shane demonstrated remarkable strength, particularly in the Sled Push and Wall Balls segments, with his wall ball time being significantly faster than the average. However, his total running time was slower than average by 2:48, indicating potential for improvement in running performance. Shane's pacing strategy suggests he might have started the race slightly too fast, as evidenced by his swift Running 1 segment, followed by slower performances in subsequent runs. This pattern, combined with his strength in exercises, suggests Shane has a hybrid profile leaning more towards strength than running.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Antino Dominic | 2019 Leipzig | 01:13:51 | |
| May Zak | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:12:53 | |
| Schiller Peter | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:12:56 | |
| Bradshaw Carson | 2022 Las Vegas | 01:13:15 | |
| Petrovic Alexander | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:13:37 | |
| Guy David | 2024 Paris | 01:12:57 | |
| Restituto Sanchez Jose | 2023 Barcelona | 01:13:12 | |
| Rice Gareth | 2023 Barcelona | 01:13:20 | |
| Valant Gasper | 2022 Leipzig | 01:13:21 | |
| Van Duijn Jeroen | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:12:53 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Sydney | 01:12:55 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
