Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Flaherty Paul's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Flaherty Paul's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Flaherty Paul's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Flaherty Paul's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:24. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:19 | 40:48 to 37:29 | 61.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:42 | 04:48 to 04:06 | 13.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:21 | 05:24 to 05:03 | 6.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:15 | 02:32 to 02:17 | 4.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:15 | 02:01 to 01:46 | 4.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:11 | 04:15 to 04:04 | 3.4% |
| Rowing | 00:11 | 04:41 to 04:30 | 3.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:10 | 04:06 to 03:56 | 3.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:07 to 04:07 | 0.0% |
| Flaherty Paul | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:05 | 00:00 | 04:15 -01:10 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:07 | 03:05 | 04:18 -00:11 | 04:15 -01:10 |
| Running 2 | 05:18 | 07:12 | 04:32 +00:46 | 08:33 -01:21 |
| Sled Push | 02:32 | 12:30 | 02:37 -00:05 | 13:05 -00:35 |
| Running 3 | 05:35 | 15:02 | 04:54 +00:41 | 15:42 -00:40 |
| Sled Pull | 04:06 | 20:37 | 04:22 -00:16 | 20:36 +00:01 |
| Running 4 | 05:43 | 24:43 | 04:52 +00:51 | 24:58 -00:15 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:15 | 30:26 | 04:32 -00:17 | 29:50 +00:36 |
| Running 5 | 05:49 | 34:41 | 05:00 +00:49 | 34:22 +00:19 |
| Rowing | 04:41 | 40:30 | 04:36 +00:05 | 39:22 +01:08 |
| Running 6 | 05:31 | 45:11 | 04:53 +00:38 | 43:58 +01:13 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:01 | 50:42 | 01:59 +00:02 | 48:51 +01:51 |
| Running 7 | 05:40 | 52:43 | 04:52 +00:48 | 50:50 +01:53 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:48 | 58:23 | 04:28 +00:20 | 55:42 +02:41 |
| Running 8 | 04:11 | 01:03:11 | 05:17 -01:06 | 01:00:10 +03:01 |
| Wall Balls | 05:24 | 01:07:22 | 05:39 -00:15 | 01:05:27 +01:55 |
| Roxzone | 04:13 | 01:16:51 | 05:45 -01:32 | 01:16:51 |
Paul Flaherty has shown a commendable performance in the 2024 Dublin Hyrox race. He finished in the top 18% overall and the top 16% in his age group, demonstrating a competitive edge in his performance. His total running time, however, was slower than average, indicating that he has a strength-oriented athlete profile. His pacing strategy appears to have been inconsistent. He started the race significantly faster than average on Running 1 and Running 8, but his pace slowed down in the middle segments of the race. His roxzone time was faster than average, indicating efficient transitions and overall fitness. His performance highlights the need for a more balanced training regimen that complements his strength-oriented profile with enhanced running capabilities.
Going forward, Paul should consider implementing the following strategies during his races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kuhn Bertrand | 2024 Bilbao | 01:16:39 | |
| Portell Rigo Matias | 2022 Madrid | 01:16:55 | |
| Hanfeld Chris | 2023 Köln | 01:17:05 | |
| Delanoue Laurent | 2024 Turin | 01:17:12 | |
| Pedroni Andrea | 2024 Rimini | 01:16:37 | |
| Sciascia Cristian | 2024 Rimini | 01:16:38 | |
| Beaulieu Paul | 2023 Paris | 01:16:44 | |
| Smith Tom | 2024 Glasgow | 01:17:11 | |
| Tarter Matt | 2024 Anaheim | 01:16:46 | |
| Ballesta Alejandro | 2023 Barcelona | 01:16:28 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
