Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Asseldonk Jolein's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Asseldonk Jolein's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Asseldonk Jolein's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Asseldonk Jolein's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:22. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:32 | 48:23 to 45:51 | 47.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:49 | 06:20 to 05:31 | 15.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:48 | 06:46 to 05:58 | 14.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:48 | 05:30 to 04:42 | 14.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:25 | 03:03 to 02:38 | 7.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:59 to 04:59 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:03 to 05:03 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:56 to 01:56 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:36 to 03:36 | 0.0% |
| Asseldonk Jolein | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:50 | 00:00 | 05:11 -01:21 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:59 | 03:50 | 05:09 -00:10 | 05:11 -01:21 |
| Running 2 | 05:53 | 08:49 | 05:33 +00:20 | 10:20 -01:31 |
| Sled Push | 03:03 | 14:42 | 02:49 +00:14 | 15:53 -01:11 |
| Running 3 | 06:20 | 17:45 | 05:52 +00:28 | 18:42 -00:57 |
| Sled Pull | 06:20 | 24:05 | 05:55 +00:25 | 24:34 -00:29 |
| Running 4 | 06:17 | 30:25 | 05:53 +00:24 | 30:29 -00:04 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:46 | 36:42 | 06:15 +00:31 | 36:22 +00:20 |
| Running 5 | 06:29 | 43:28 | 06:02 +00:27 | 42:37 +00:51 |
| Rowing | 05:03 | 49:57 | 05:26 -00:23 | 48:39 +01:18 |
| Running 6 | 06:18 | 55:00 | 05:56 +00:22 | 54:05 +00:55 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:56 | 01:01:18 | 02:19 -00:23 | 01:00:01 +01:17 |
| Running 7 | 06:11 | 01:03:14 | 05:55 +00:16 | 01:02:20 +00:54 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:30 | 01:09:25 | 04:54 +00:36 | 01:08:15 +01:10 |
| Running 8 | 07:10 | 01:14:55 | 06:22 +00:48 | 01:13:09 +01:46 |
| Wall Balls | 03:36 | 01:22:05 | 05:07 -01:31 | 01:19:31 +02:34 |
| Roxzone | 06:14 | 01:31:46 | 07:08 -00:54 | 01:31:46 |
In terms of pacing, Jolein showed good consistency throughout the race, with the majority of her splits being within a reasonable range of the average. However, there were a few segments where she lost time compared to the average, which we will address in the next section.
Based on the splits analysis, Jolein seems to have a well-rounded profile with a slightly stronger emphasis on running. Her total running time of 48:23 was 3:03 slower than the average, indicating that she could benefit from improving her overall fitness and transition time. Additionally, her best running lap of 3:50 was 1:11 faster than the average, highlighting her running ability.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on the identified areas of improvement, Jolein can further enhance her performance in future Hyrox races. Regular training, proper nutrition, and adequate rest will also play crucial roles in her overall success.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Obenaus Sabine | 2023 Hannover | 01:31:34 | |
| Clark Rhea | 2024 London | 01:31:16 | |
| Pichlmaier Julia | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:31:48 | |
| Williams Georgia | 2024 Birmingham | 01:32:11 | |
| Cismak Viviane | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:31:17 | |
| Ibarra Blackmoon Kaylei | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:32:11 | |
| Cunliffe Heavenly | 2024 London | 01:32:16 | |
| Ficut Catalina | 2024 Maastricht | 01:31:31 | |
| Hopkins Amy | 2024 Cape Town | 01:32:07 | |
| Sánchez Sánchez Elena | 2024 Madrid | 01:31:26 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
