Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Den Berg Niels's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Den Berg Niels's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Den Berg Niels's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Den Berg Niels's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:29. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:28 | 49:46 to 46:18 | 63.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:34 | 07:40 to 06:06 | 28.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:27 | 05:55 to 05:28 | 8.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:03 to 04:03 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:00 to 03:00 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:19 to 02:19 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:35 to 05:35 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:27 to 05:27 | 0.0% |
| Van Den Berg Niels | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:00 | 00:00 | 04:59 -00:59 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:03 | 04:00 | 04:37 -00:34 | 04:59 -00:59 |
| Running 2 | 05:56 | 08:03 | 05:26 +00:30 | 09:36 -01:33 |
| Sled Push | 03:00 | 13:59 | 03:15 -00:15 | 15:02 -01:03 |
| Running 3 | 06:33 | 16:59 | 05:59 +00:34 | 18:17 -01:18 |
| Sled Pull | 05:55 | 23:32 | 05:40 +00:15 | 24:16 -00:44 |
| Running 4 | 06:19 | 29:27 | 05:56 +00:23 | 29:56 -00:29 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:40 | 35:46 | 06:22 +01:18 | 35:52 -00:06 |
| Running 5 | 06:31 | 43:26 | 06:10 +00:21 | 42:14 +01:12 |
| Rowing | 04:47 | 49:57 | 05:03 -00:16 | 48:24 +01:33 |
| Running 6 | 06:28 | 54:44 | 05:59 +00:29 | 53:27 +01:17 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:19 | 01:01:12 | 02:25 -00:06 | 59:26 +01:46 |
| Running 7 | 06:14 | 01:03:31 | 05:58 +00:16 | 01:01:51 +01:40 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:35 | 01:09:45 | 05:55 -00:20 | 01:07:49 +01:56 |
| Running 8 | 07:49 | 01:15:20 | 06:53 +00:56 | 01:13:44 +01:36 |
| Wall Balls | 05:27 | 01:23:09 | 07:42 -02:15 | 01:20:37 +02:32 |
| Roxzone | 08:10 | 01:36:38 | 08:19 -00:09 | 01:36:38 |
Niels performed exceptionally well in the Running 1 and Ski Erg segments, where he was 00:48 and 00:30 faster than the average, respectively. He also showed strength in the Sled Push and Rowing segments, where he was 00:32 and 00:11 faster than the average, respectively. However, he struggled in several running segments, with Running 2, Running 3, Running 6, and Running 8 being slower than the average by 00:32, 00:29, 00:27, and 00:49, respectively. The Burpees Broad Jump segment was his weakest, being 01:41 slower than the average.
In summary, Niels Van Den Berg had a commendable performance in the 2023 Amsterdam Hyrox race. While he showed strengths in certain segments, there are areas for improvement, particularly in the Burpees Broad Jump and running segments. By incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, focusing on pacing, improving transition efficiency, and maintaining a balanced training program, Niels can enhance his overall performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Anselm Arthur | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:36:37 | |
| Mcgarrity Brian | 2023 Glasgow | 01:36:36 | |
| Seignez Benjamin | 2024 Paris | 01:36:25 | |
| Sommer Dennis | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:36:25 | |
| Becker Stefan | 2022 Hamburg | 01:36:53 | |
| Villegas Osorio Leonardo Esteban | 2023 Madrid | 01:36:33 | |
| Comerford Daniel | 2023 Stockholm | 01:36:50 | |
| Mcmillan Callum | 2024 Glasgow | 01:36:36 | |
| Abied Ramin | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:36:17 | |
| Buhlman Stephen | 2024 Sydney | 01:36:58 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:26:41 | |
| 2024 Maastricht | 01:31:11 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
