Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Stuttgart using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Schreiber Natalie's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Schreiber Natalie's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Schreiber Natalie's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Schreiber Natalie's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:19. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:25 | 07:02 to 05:37 | 61.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:16 | 06:22 to 06:06 | 11.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:13 | 05:19 to 05:06 | 9.4% |
| Rowing | 00:12 | 05:34 to 05:22 | 8.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:10 | 02:22 to 02:12 | 7.2% |
| Run Total | 00:03 | 46:27 to 46:24 | 2.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:36 to 02:36 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:31 to 04:31 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:31 to 04:31 | 0.0% |
| Schreiber Natalie | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:04 | 00:00 | 05:16 -00:12 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:19 | 05:04 | 05:10 +00:09 | 05:16 -00:12 |
| Running 2 | 05:28 | 10:23 | 05:36 -00:08 | 10:26 -00:03 |
| Sled Push | 02:36 | 15:51 | 02:49 -00:13 | 16:02 -00:11 |
| Running 3 | 06:14 | 18:27 | 05:53 +00:21 | 18:51 -00:24 |
| Sled Pull | 07:02 | 24:41 | 05:58 +01:04 | 24:44 -00:03 |
| Running 4 | 05:45 | 31:43 | 05:56 -00:11 | 30:42 +01:01 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:22 | 37:28 | 06:26 -00:04 | 36:38 +00:50 |
| Running 5 | 05:54 | 43:50 | 06:06 -00:12 | 43:04 +00:46 |
| Rowing | 05:34 | 49:44 | 05:27 +00:07 | 49:10 +00:34 |
| Running 6 | 05:45 | 55:18 | 05:58 -00:13 | 54:37 +00:41 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:22 | 01:01:03 | 02:18 +00:04 | 01:00:35 +00:28 |
| Running 7 | 06:01 | 01:03:25 | 05:55 +00:06 | 01:02:53 +00:32 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:31 | 01:09:26 | 04:59 -00:28 | 01:08:48 +00:38 |
| Running 8 | 06:19 | 01:13:57 | 06:27 -00:08 | 01:13:47 +00:10 |
| Wall Balls | 04:31 | 01:20:16 | 05:13 -00:42 | 01:20:14 +00:02 |
| Roxzone | 08:02 | 01:32:42 | 07:15 +00:47 | 01:32:42 |
Natalie Schreiber delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Stuttgart Hyrox event, securing a top 17% overall finish among 1130 athletes. In her age group (16-24), she ranked 24th out of 100 participants, which places her in the top 24%. Natalie's overall time was 01:32:42, with her total running time being 46:27, which was 1:20 faster than the average. This suggests that Natalie has a stronger running profile. Her pacing was generally well-managed, although the slower time in Running 3 indicates a possible mid-race lag that needs addressing.
By focusing on these areas, Natalie can transform her weaker segments into strengths, further enhancing her overall performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Flinn Stacey | 2024 Manchester | 01:32:51 | |
| Beekman Jenny | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:32:22 | |
| Goldschmidt Frauke | 2023 Hannover | 01:33:08 | |
| OSullivan Samantha | 2024 Stockholm | 01:32:34 | |
| Black Roo | 2024 Manchester | 01:32:18 | |
| Robb Karen | 2024 Glasgow | 01:32:39 | |
| Leonard Georgia | 2024 Melbourne | 01:32:27 | |
| Landsmann Tina | 2022 Leipzig | 01:32:15 | |
| Roelofs Ezra | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:32:39 | |
| Gotowala Karolina | 2024 Milan | 01:32:52 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Frankfurt | — | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
