Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Schet Pascal's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Schet Pascal's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Schet Pascal's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Schet Pascal's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:37. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:32 | 42:30 to 39:58 | 54.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:05 | 05:42 to 04:37 | 23.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:25 | 04:56 to 04:31 | 9.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:25 | 06:02 to 05:37 | 9.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:08 | 02:04 to 01:56 | 2.9% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 04:40 to 04:38 | 0.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:02 to 04:02 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:16 to 02:16 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:20 to 04:20 | 0.0% |
| Schet Pascal | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:23 | 00:00 | 04:30 -01:07 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:02 | 03:23 | 04:23 -00:21 | 04:30 -01:07 |
| Running 2 | 05:13 | 07:25 | 04:47 +00:26 | 08:53 -01:28 |
| Sled Push | 02:16 | 12:38 | 02:46 -00:30 | 13:40 -01:02 |
| Running 3 | 05:36 | 14:54 | 05:11 +00:25 | 16:26 -01:32 |
| Sled Pull | 04:20 | 20:30 | 04:40 -00:20 | 21:37 -01:07 |
| Running 4 | 05:28 | 24:50 | 05:09 +00:19 | 26:17 -01:27 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:42 | 30:18 | 04:58 +00:44 | 31:26 -01:08 |
| Running 5 | 05:36 | 36:00 | 05:19 +00:17 | 36:24 -00:24 |
| Rowing | 04:40 | 41:36 | 04:44 -00:04 | 41:43 -00:07 |
| Running 6 | 05:40 | 46:16 | 05:12 +00:28 | 46:27 -00:11 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:04 | 51:56 | 02:06 -00:02 | 51:39 +00:17 |
| Running 7 | 05:32 | 54:00 | 05:10 +00:22 | 53:45 +00:15 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:56 | 59:32 | 04:50 +00:06 | 58:55 +00:37 |
| Running 8 | 06:05 | 01:04:28 | 05:41 +00:24 | 01:03:45 +00:43 |
| Wall Balls | 06:02 | 01:10:33 | 06:07 -00:05 | 01:09:26 +01:07 |
| Roxzone | 05:25 | 01:21:53 | 06:20 -00:55 | 01:21:53 |
Pascal Schet performed commendably in the 2024 Amsterdam HYROX race, finishing in the top 26% overall and top 32% in his age group. This indicates a strong competitive capability. The overall time of 01:21:53 showcases his dedication and effort. However, his total running time was 00:42:30, which is 01:06 slower than the average, suggesting that there is room for improvement in running endurance. Interestingly, Pascal demonstrated a strong start with an impressive Running 1 segment, ranking in the 5th percentile.
Pascal's performance profile suggests a hybrid athlete with a slight inclination towards strength, given the faster-than-average completion of strength-based exercises like the Sled Push and Ski Erg. Nevertheless, there is a need to focus on enhancing running endurance and efficiency, especially after strength exercises.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Vázquez Atienza Fernando | 2021 Madrid | 01:21:47 | |
| Constantinescu Tudor | 2023 London | 01:21:55 | |
| Hansen Christian | 2024 Malaga | 01:22:09 | |
| Eyre Stephen | 2024 Sydney | 01:22:17 | |
| Mills Steven | 2022 Birmingham | 01:22:11 | |
| Ross Brad | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:21:26 | |
| Chew Jing Yan | 2023 Singapore | 01:22:12 | |
| Weiner Adam | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:22:20 | |
| Lam Yi He | 2024 Singapore | 01:21:34 | |
| Casey Stephen | 2024 Malaga | 01:22:14 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:26:53 | |
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:33:54 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
