Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Reilly Daniel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Reilly Daniel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Reilly Daniel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Reilly Daniel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:45. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:02 | 50:54 to 45:52 | 74.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:32 | 07:32 to 06:00 | 22.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:11 | 05:49 to 05:38 | 2.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:28 to 04:28 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:27 to 02:27 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:12 to 04:12 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:41 to 04:41 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:07 to 02:07 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:11 to 06:11 | 0.0% |
| Reilly Daniel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:19 | 00:00 | 04:57 -00:38 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:28 | 04:19 | 04:35 -00:07 | 04:57 -00:38 |
| Running 2 | 05:50 | 08:47 | 05:23 +00:27 | 09:32 -00:45 |
| Sled Push | 02:27 | 14:37 | 03:13 -00:46 | 14:55 -00:18 |
| Running 3 | 06:32 | 17:04 | 05:51 +00:41 | 18:08 -01:04 |
| Sled Pull | 04:12 | 23:36 | 05:33 -01:21 | 23:59 -00:23 |
| Running 4 | 06:51 | 27:48 | 05:52 +00:59 | 29:32 -01:44 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:32 | 34:39 | 06:15 +01:17 | 35:24 -00:45 |
| Running 5 | 06:50 | 42:11 | 06:06 +00:44 | 41:39 +00:32 |
| Rowing | 04:41 | 49:01 | 05:03 -00:22 | 47:45 +01:16 |
| Running 6 | 06:40 | 53:42 | 05:54 +00:46 | 52:48 +00:54 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:07 | 01:00:22 | 02:26 -00:19 | 58:42 +01:40 |
| Running 7 | 06:46 | 01:02:29 | 05:53 +00:53 | 01:01:08 +01:21 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:49 | 01:09:15 | 05:52 -00:03 | 01:07:01 +02:14 |
| Running 8 | 07:10 | 01:15:04 | 06:50 +00:20 | 01:12:53 +02:11 |
| Wall Balls | 06:11 | 01:22:14 | 07:34 -01:23 | 01:19:43 +02:31 |
| Roxzone | 07:09 | 01:35:25 | 08:08 -00:59 | 01:35:25 |
Daniel Reilly's performance in the Manchester 2024 HYROX race showcased a combination of strengths and areas for improvement. His overall time of 01:35:25 places him in the top 81% of 1203 athletes and top 85% of his age group (35-39). His performance was particularly strong in the Sled Push and Sled Pull segments, where he outperformed the average by a significant margin. However, his total running time was slower than average, indicating a need for improvement in this area.
Examining his pacing, Daniel started off strong, performing faster than average in the first Running segment. However, his pace slowed down in subsequent Running segments. This suggests that Daniel may have started the race too fast and was unable to maintain his initial pace. In terms of profile, with a total running time slower than average and strong performances in strength-oriented segments, Daniel appears to have more of a strength-based profile than a running profile.
Going forward, Daniel could consider implementing the following strategies for better race performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hart Joe | 2024 Manchester | 01:35:51 | |
| Mohammad Bestun | 2024 Manchester | 01:35:49 | |
| Cuffini Simone | 2024 Rimini | 01:35:07 | |
| Dia Tobias | 2022 Essen | 01:35:12 | |
| Castellari Luca | 2024 Rimini | 01:35:20 | |
| Giner Laurent | 2024 Marseille | 01:35:07 | |
| Beevor Ian | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:35:16 | |
| Jarrett Niki | 2024 Perth | 01:35:47 | |
| Hayes Kody | 2023 Singapore | 01:35:46 | |
| Wilson Matthew | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:35:34 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 London | 01:50:19 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
