Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Nichol Ian's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Nichol Ian's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Nichol Ian's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Nichol Ian's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 01:45. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 00:56 | 04:41 to 03:45 | 53.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:16 | 02:26 to 02:10 | 15.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:14 | 04:21 to 04:07 | 13.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:09 | 03:58 to 03:49 | 8.6% |
| Rowing | 00:09 | 04:35 to 04:26 | 8.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:01 | 01:42 to 01:41 | 1.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:29 to 03:29 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:31 to 04:31 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 36:09 to 36:09 | 0.0% |
| Nichol Ian | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:15 | 00:00 | 04:09 +01:06 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:21 | 05:15 | 04:15 +00:06 | 04:09 +01:06 |
| Running 2 | 04:19 | 09:36 | 04:26 -00:07 | 08:24 +01:12 |
| Sled Push | 02:26 | 13:55 | 02:33 -00:07 | 12:50 +01:05 |
| Running 3 | 04:23 | 16:21 | 04:47 -00:24 | 15:23 +00:58 |
| Sled Pull | 04:41 | 20:44 | 04:11 +00:30 | 20:10 +00:34 |
| Running 4 | 04:27 | 25:25 | 04:45 -00:18 | 24:21 +01:04 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:58 | 29:52 | 04:21 -00:23 | 29:06 +00:46 |
| Running 5 | 04:20 | 33:50 | 04:54 -00:34 | 33:27 +00:23 |
| Rowing | 04:35 | 38:10 | 04:33 +00:02 | 38:21 -00:11 |
| Running 6 | 04:28 | 42:45 | 04:47 -00:19 | 42:54 -00:09 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:42 | 47:13 | 01:54 -00:12 | 47:41 -00:28 |
| Running 7 | 04:21 | 48:55 | 04:46 -00:25 | 49:35 -00:40 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:29 | 53:16 | 04:19 -00:50 | 54:21 -01:05 |
| Running 8 | 04:39 | 56:45 | 05:08 -00:29 | 58:40 -01:55 |
| Wall Balls | 04:31 | 01:01:24 | 05:23 -00:52 | 01:03:48 -02:24 |
| Roxzone | 08:53 | 01:14:40 | 05:29 +03:24 | 01:14:40 |
First and foremost, Ian Nichol demonstrated an impressive performance, placing in the top 12% of all athletes and in the top 15% of his age group. His total running time was 1:50 faster than average, highlighting his strength in running.
However, Ian's slower start in the first running segment (1:06 slower than average) suggests that he may be starting off at a slower pace than his competitors. This pacing strategy, while beneficial in endurance events, might be limiting his overall performance in the HYROX race. Despite this slower start, he consistently improved his running times throughout the race, which reflects his excellent endurance and adaptability. Ian's performance appears to favor running, suggesting a runner profile.
The following strategies could be implemented during the race for better performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Böhmer Wouter | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:14:12 | |
| Chandelier Benoit | 2024 Marseille | 01:14:55 | |
| Mutel Maxime | 2024 Marseille | 01:14:36 | |
| Steerneman Bart | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:14:29 | |
| Jensen Sikker | 2024 Malaga | 01:14:45 | |
| Mcguire Jordan | 2022 Birmingham | 01:14:58 | |
| Schöneweiß Henning | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:14:27 | |
| English Harry | 2024 Dublin | 01:14:29 | |
| Varga Peter | 2024 Manchester | 01:14:47 | |
| Michalak Thibaut | 2024 Marseille | 01:14:21 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 London | 01:07:36 | |
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:25:59 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
