Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Stuttgart using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Dengg Michael's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Dengg Michael's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Dengg Michael's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Dengg Michael's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:04. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:54 | 06:23 to 05:29 | 43.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:36 | 05:49 to 05:13 | 29.0% |
| Run Total | 00:22 | 44:05 to 43:43 | 17.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:04 | 04:33 to 04:29 | 3.2% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 04:54 to 04:51 | 2.4% |
| Wall Balls | 00:03 | 06:39 to 06:36 | 2.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:02 | 02:13 to 02:11 | 1.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:29 to 02:29 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:40 to 04:40 | 0.0% |
| Dengg Michael | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:10 | 00:00 | 04:45 +00:25 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:33 | 05:10 | 04:31 +00:02 | 04:45 +00:25 |
| Running 2 | 04:52 | 09:43 | 05:08 -00:16 | 09:16 +00:27 |
| Sled Push | 02:29 | 14:35 | 03:05 -00:36 | 14:24 +00:11 |
| Running 3 | 05:03 | 17:04 | 05:37 -00:34 | 17:29 -00:25 |
| Sled Pull | 04:40 | 22:07 | 05:15 -00:35 | 23:06 -00:59 |
| Running 4 | 05:05 | 26:47 | 05:37 -00:32 | 28:21 -01:34 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:23 | 31:52 | 05:45 +00:38 | 33:58 -02:06 |
| Running 5 | 05:33 | 38:15 | 05:47 -00:14 | 39:43 -01:28 |
| Rowing | 04:54 | 43:48 | 04:55 -00:01 | 45:30 -01:42 |
| Running 6 | 05:30 | 48:42 | 05:38 -00:08 | 50:25 -01:43 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:13 | 54:12 | 02:17 -00:04 | 56:03 -01:51 |
| Running 7 | 05:34 | 56:25 | 05:37 -00:03 | 58:20 -01:55 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:49 | 01:01:59 | 05:28 +00:21 | 01:03:57 -01:58 |
| Running 8 | 07:22 | 01:07:48 | 06:19 +01:03 | 01:09:25 -01:37 |
| Wall Balls | 06:39 | 01:15:10 | 06:58 -00:19 | 01:15:44 -00:34 |
| Roxzone | 08:29 | 01:30:09 | 07:27 +01:02 | 01:30:09 |
Michael Dengg's performance in the 2024 Stuttgart HYROX race was commendable, placing him in the top 40% overall and top 41% within his age group. His total running time of 44:05 was 45 seconds faster than the average, indicating a strong running capability. However, his pacing strategy showed a slightly conservative start, with his first running segment slower than average. Michael demonstrated a hybrid profile, excelling in both strength and running, though his running is more pronounced as a strength. Despite a strong overall showing, there are areas for improvement, particularly in transitional and specific strength segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Blumberg Florian | 2018 Hamburg | 01:29:59 | |
| Bitsch Jason | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:30:24 | |
| Leemans Jérôme | 2024 Köln | 01:29:45 | |
| Smith Tony | 2024 Birmingham | 01:30:25 | |
| Zientara Tyler | 2022 Dallas | 01:29:52 | |
| Meffert Christian | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:30:34 | |
| Barker Chris | 2024 Manchester | 01:29:55 | |
| Austin Lee | 2024 Brisbane | 01:30:08 | |
| Gray Peter | 2024 Glasgow | 01:29:59 | |
| Bayliss Mark | 2022 London | 01:29:52 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Köln | 01:26:38 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
