Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2021 New York using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Cunningham Brian's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Cunningham Brian's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Cunningham Brian's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Cunningham Brian's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:49. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Push | 02:00 | 04:57 to 02:57 | 52.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:34 | 06:06 to 05:32 | 14.8% |
| Run Total | 00:34 | 44:28 to 43:54 | 14.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:26 | 05:41 to 05:15 | 11.4% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 05:00 to 04:52 | 3.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:07 | 02:19 to 02:12 | 3.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:23 to 04:23 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:53 to 04:53 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:23 to 06:23 | 0.0% |
| Cunningham Brian | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:13 | 00:00 | 04:46 -00:33 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:23 | 04:13 | 04:31 -00:08 | 04:46 -00:33 |
| Running 2 | 05:00 | 08:36 | 05:11 -00:11 | 09:17 -00:41 |
| Sled Push | 04:57 | 13:36 | 03:04 +01:53 | 14:28 -00:52 |
| Running 3 | 05:56 | 18:33 | 05:40 +00:16 | 17:32 +01:01 |
| Sled Pull | 04:53 | 24:29 | 05:17 -00:24 | 23:12 +01:17 |
| Running 4 | 05:42 | 29:22 | 05:38 +00:04 | 28:29 +00:53 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:06 | 35:04 | 05:49 +00:17 | 34:07 +00:57 |
| Running 5 | 06:07 | 41:10 | 05:51 +00:16 | 39:56 +01:14 |
| Rowing | 05:00 | 47:17 | 04:56 +00:04 | 45:47 +01:30 |
| Running 6 | 05:25 | 52:17 | 05:41 -00:16 | 50:43 +01:34 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:19 | 57:42 | 02:18 +00:01 | 56:24 +01:18 |
| Running 7 | 05:52 | 01:00:01 | 05:39 +00:13 | 58:42 +01:19 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:41 | 01:05:53 | 05:30 +00:11 | 01:04:21 +01:32 |
| Running 8 | 06:14 | 01:11:34 | 06:23 -00:09 | 01:09:51 +01:43 |
| Wall Balls | 06:23 | 01:17:48 | 07:05 -00:42 | 01:16:14 +01:34 |
| Roxzone | 06:45 | 01:30:50 | 07:31 -00:46 | 01:30:50 |
Based on the splits analysis, Brian performed exceptionally well in the Running 1 and Ski Erg segments, finishing 25 seconds faster and 4 seconds faster than the average, respectively. This indicates that he has good running and cardio endurance capabilities. However, he faced challenges in segments such as Sled Push, Burpees Broad Jump, Sandbag Lunges, Running 5, Running 3, and Running 7, where he lost significant time compared to the average.
Overall, Brian Cunningham had a strong performance in the 2021 New York Hyrox race, but there are areas where he can improve. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques in the identified areas, he can enhance his performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rutter Brian | 2024 Bilbao | 01:31:04 | |
| Fizames Rémy | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:31:09 | |
| Damiani Giorgio | 2024 Turin | 01:30:46 | |
| Mayer Felix | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:30:25 | |
| Gawryjoek Piotr | 2024 Gdansk | 01:30:40 | |
| Risch Patrick | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:30:30 | |
| Ng Ashley | 2024 Singapore | 01:31:06 | |
| Molinari Paul | 2024 Marseille | 01:31:07 | |
| Knowles Adam | 2022 London | 01:30:50 | |
| Makaryan Sergey | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:30:35 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:18:38 | |
| 2024 Houston | 01:17:01 | |
| 2022 New York | 01:27:34 | |
| 2023 Chicago | 01:21:33 | |
| 2023 New York | 01:33:06 | |
| 2024 New York | 01:17:10 | |
| 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:19:49 | |
| 2024 Dallas | 01:22:43 | |
| 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:29:26 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
