Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Whyte Peter's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Whyte Peter's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Whyte Peter's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Whyte Peter's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:44. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 02:20 | 06:46 to 04:26 | 40.7% |
| Run Total | 01:10 | 41:39 to 40:29 | 20.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:46 | 05:29 to 04:43 | 13.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:44 | 03:19 to 02:35 | 12.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:43 | 06:28 to 05:45 | 12.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 04:20 to 04:19 | 0.3% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:55 to 01:55 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:12 to 04:12 | 0.0% |
| Whyte Peter | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:16 | 00:00 | 04:30 -01:14 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:20 | 03:16 | 04:24 -00:04 | 04:30 -01:14 |
| Running 2 | 05:17 | 07:36 | 04:51 +00:26 | 08:54 -01:18 |
| Sled Push | 03:19 | 12:53 | 02:50 +00:29 | 13:45 -00:52 |
| Running 3 | 05:25 | 16:12 | 05:14 +00:11 | 16:35 -00:23 |
| Sled Pull | 06:46 | 21:37 | 04:45 +02:01 | 21:49 -00:12 |
| Running 4 | 05:38 | 28:23 | 05:13 +00:25 | 26:34 +01:49 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:29 | 34:01 | 05:02 +00:27 | 31:47 +02:14 |
| Running 5 | 05:38 | 39:30 | 05:22 +00:16 | 36:49 +02:41 |
| Rowing | 04:38 | 45:08 | 04:45 -00:07 | 42:11 +02:57 |
| Running 6 | 05:32 | 49:46 | 05:15 +00:17 | 46:56 +02:50 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:55 | 55:18 | 02:07 -00:12 | 52:11 +03:07 |
| Running 7 | 05:27 | 57:13 | 05:14 +00:13 | 54:18 +02:55 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:12 | 01:02:40 | 04:53 -00:41 | 59:32 +03:08 |
| Running 8 | 05:30 | 01:06:52 | 05:44 -00:14 | 01:04:25 +02:27 |
| Wall Balls | 06:28 | 01:12:22 | 06:14 +00:14 | 01:10:09 +02:13 |
| Roxzone | 04:07 | 01:22:48 | 06:25 -02:18 | 01:22:48 |
In terms of pacing, Peter demonstrated excellent speed and efficiency in the Running 1 segment, completing it in 3 minutes and 16 seconds, which is 1 minute and 5 seconds faster than the average time. This indicates that Peter has a strong running profile and should continue to emphasize his running training.
However, there were several segments where Peter lost time compared to the average. These segments include Running 2, Sled Push, Running 3, Sled Pull, Running 4, Burpees Broad Jump, Running 5, Running 6, Running 7, and Wall Balls. These segments should be a focus for improvement in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Corcoran Shaun | 2024 Glasgow | 01:22:22 | |
| Willis Mark | 2024 Glasgow | 01:23:11 | |
| Barber Stuart | 2023 London | 01:22:21 | |
| Gooding Alexander | 2021 New York | 01:23:13 | |
| Della Rossa Gianfranco | 2023 Milan | 01:22:27 | |
| Spencer Samuel | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:22:41 | |
| Van Dorst Thomas | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:22:39 | |
| Power Jesse | 2024 Milan | 01:22:34 | |
| Geertsma Milan | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:22:57 | |
| Smith Ron | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:23:07 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
