Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Lewis Ash's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Lewis Ash's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Lewis Ash's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Lewis Ash's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:46. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:35 | 07:03 to 05:28 | 57.2% |
| Run Total | 00:49 | 47:07 to 46:18 | 29.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:18 | 07:38 to 07:20 | 10.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:04 | 02:27 to 02:23 | 2.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 03:54 to 03:54 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:00 to 03:00 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:58 to 04:58 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:59 to 04:59 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:07 to 05:07 | 0.0% |
| Lewis Ash | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:59 | 00:00 | 05:00 -00:01 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:54 | 04:59 | 04:37 -00:43 | 05:00 -00:01 |
| Running 2 | 05:01 | 08:53 | 05:25 -00:24 | 09:37 -00:44 |
| Sled Push | 03:00 | 13:54 | 03:14 -00:14 | 15:02 -01:08 |
| Running 3 | 06:00 | 16:54 | 05:56 +00:04 | 18:16 -01:22 |
| Sled Pull | 07:03 | 22:54 | 05:38 +01:25 | 24:12 -01:18 |
| Running 4 | 06:16 | 29:57 | 05:55 +00:21 | 29:50 +00:07 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:58 | 36:13 | 06:21 -01:23 | 35:45 +00:28 |
| Running 5 | 05:38 | 41:11 | 06:08 -00:30 | 42:06 -00:55 |
| Rowing | 04:59 | 46:49 | 05:03 -00:04 | 48:14 -01:25 |
| Running 6 | 06:49 | 51:48 | 05:58 +00:51 | 53:17 -01:29 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:27 | 58:37 | 02:26 +00:01 | 59:15 -00:38 |
| Running 7 | 06:20 | 01:01:04 | 05:56 +00:24 | 01:01:41 -00:37 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:07 | 01:07:24 | 05:55 -00:48 | 01:07:37 -00:13 |
| Running 8 | 06:08 | 01:12:31 | 06:49 -00:41 | 01:13:32 -01:01 |
| Wall Balls | 07:38 | 01:18:39 | 07:42 -00:04 | 01:20:21 -01:42 |
| Roxzone | 10:08 | 01:36:16 | 08:13 +01:55 | 01:36:16 |
In terms of his splits, Ash had his best running lap at 00:04:59, which was 00:13 slower than the average. He performed particularly well in the Ski Erg and Sled Push segments, finishing 00:39 and 00:32 faster than the average, respectively. However, he struggled in the Sled Pull segment, finishing 01:05 slower than the average. He also lost time in the Roxzone, Running 6, and Running 7 segments.
By implementing these strategies and incorporating specific exercises and drills into his training routine, Ash can improve his performance in the HYROX race and achieve better results in future competitions.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Luke | 2024 London | 01:36:02 | |
| Rangel Velázquez Ivan Israel | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:35:56 | |
| Plenge Matthias | 2019 Essen | 01:36:29 | |
| Dean Stee | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:35:59 | |
| Hofer Johannes | 2023 München | 01:36:05 | |
| Pickard Charles | 2020 Chicago | 01:36:15 | |
| Berry Chase | 2023 Melbourne | 01:36:03 | |
| Ragab Ahmed | 2019 Hannover | 01:36:23 | |
| Heyder Tony | 2022 Leipzig | 01:36:42 | |
| Gnamm Michael | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:35:51 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Glasgow | 01:22:12 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
