Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hizzett Tom's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hizzett Tom's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hizzett Tom's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hizzett Tom's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:42. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:49 | 07:05 to 06:16 | 30.2% |
| Rowing | 00:41 | 05:44 to 05:03 | 25.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:24 | 07:56 to 07:32 | 14.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:19 | 04:57 to 04:38 | 11.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:15 | 05:51 to 05:36 | 9.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:14 | 02:40 to 02:26 | 8.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:27 to 02:27 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:49 to 05:49 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 45:44 to 45:44 | 0.0% |
| Hizzett Tom | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:37 | 00:00 | 05:03 +00:34 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:57 | 05:37 | 04:38 +00:19 | 05:03 +00:34 |
| Running 2 | 05:02 | 10:34 | 05:29 -00:27 | 09:41 +00:53 |
| Sled Push | 02:27 | 15:36 | 03:18 -00:51 | 15:10 +00:26 |
| Running 3 | 05:24 | 18:03 | 06:01 -00:37 | 18:28 -00:25 |
| Sled Pull | 05:51 | 23:27 | 05:45 +00:06 | 24:29 -01:02 |
| Running 4 | 05:41 | 29:18 | 06:02 -00:21 | 30:14 -00:56 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:05 | 34:59 | 06:31 +00:34 | 36:16 -01:17 |
| Running 5 | 06:12 | 42:04 | 06:16 -00:04 | 42:47 -00:43 |
| Rowing | 05:44 | 48:16 | 05:06 +00:38 | 49:03 -00:47 |
| Running 6 | 05:37 | 54:00 | 06:05 -00:28 | 54:09 -00:09 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:40 | 59:37 | 02:28 +00:12 | 01:00:14 -00:37 |
| Running 7 | 05:48 | 01:02:17 | 06:04 -00:16 | 01:02:42 -00:25 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:49 | 01:08:05 | 06:05 -00:16 | 01:08:46 -00:41 |
| Running 8 | 06:27 | 01:13:54 | 07:02 -00:35 | 01:14:51 -00:57 |
| Wall Balls | 07:56 | 01:20:21 | 07:51 +00:05 | 01:21:53 -01:32 |
| Roxzone | 09:58 | 01:38:07 | 08:23 +01:35 | 01:38:07 |
Tom Hizzett demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham event. Despite being in the top 51% of all athletes, he showed exceptional strength particularly in the running segments. His overall running time was 2 minutes and 27 seconds faster than the average. This implies that Tom has a strong runner's profile. However, his transition times, as indicated by the roxzone segment, were slower than average suggesting an area for improvement. His pacing throughout the race was generally good, however, the first running segment suggests he may have started too slow compared to the average.
Implementing effective race strategies can greatly enhance Tom's overall performance. Here are a few suggestions:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Philippi Andrew | 2023 Chicago | 01:37:57 | |
| Benson Matthew | 2023 Manchester | 01:38:16 | |
| Campbell Mason | 2023 Melbourne | 01:38:12 | |
| Marques Perales Jorge | 2022 Bremen | 01:38:21 | |
| Gonzalez Garcia Jose Luis | 2024 Madrid | 01:38:33 | |
| Wagner Markus | 2019 Wien | 01:38:22 | |
| Serafini Fabio | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:38:33 | |
| DiNapoli Chris | 2024 New York | 01:37:52 | |
| Hansen Judge | 2024 Dallas | 01:38:02 | |
| Lim Hyungbin | 2024 Incheon | 01:37:53 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
