Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Derecourt Molly's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Derecourt Molly's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Derecourt Molly's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Derecourt Molly's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:53. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:34 | 51:05 to 45:31 | 80.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:52 | 06:19 to 05:27 | 12.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:12 | 04:50 to 04:38 | 2.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:08 | 02:17 to 02:09 | 1.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:07 | 06:00 to 05:53 | 1.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:33 to 04:33 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:27 to 01:27 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:04 to 05:04 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:20 to 03:20 | 0.0% |
| Derecourt Molly | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:55 | 00:00 | 05:10 -00:15 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:33 | 04:55 | 05:08 -00:35 | 05:10 -00:15 |
| Running 2 | 04:45 | 09:28 | 05:31 -00:46 | 10:18 -00:50 |
| Sled Push | 01:27 | 14:13 | 02:45 -01:18 | 15:49 -01:36 |
| Running 3 | 05:35 | 15:40 | 05:50 -00:15 | 18:34 -02:54 |
| Sled Pull | 06:19 | 21:15 | 05:51 +00:28 | 24:24 -03:09 |
| Running 4 | 05:15 | 27:34 | 05:51 -00:36 | 30:15 -02:41 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:00 | 32:49 | 06:14 -00:14 | 36:06 -03:17 |
| Running 5 | 10:00 | 38:49 | 05:59 +04:01 | 42:20 -03:31 |
| Rowing | 05:04 | 48:49 | 05:24 -00:20 | 48:19 +00:30 |
| Running 6 | 05:17 | 53:53 | 05:54 -00:37 | 53:43 +00:10 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:17 | 59:10 | 02:16 +00:01 | 59:37 -00:27 |
| Running 7 | 09:48 | 01:01:27 | 05:52 +03:56 | 01:01:53 -00:26 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:50 | 01:11:15 | 04:53 -00:03 | 01:07:45 +03:30 |
| Running 8 | 05:34 | 01:16:05 | 06:17 -00:43 | 01:12:38 +03:27 |
| Wall Balls | 03:20 | 01:21:39 | 05:00 -01:40 | 01:18:55 +02:44 |
| Roxzone | 06:04 | 01:30:55 | 07:00 -00:56 | 01:30:55 |
Molly Derecourt's overall performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race was commendable, finishing in the top 18% out of 1801 athletes. Her performance in strength-based exercises like the Ski Erg, Sled Push, and Wall Balls was exceptional, indicating a strong aptitude for strength-oriented events. However, the total running time was 4:03 slower than average, suggesting that running is an area that needs improvement. Notably, her running started strong in the initial segments but dropped significantly in the latter parts, indicating potential challenges in endurance or pacing. Molly exhibits a hybrid profile but leans more towards strength than running.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gallet Caitlin | 2022 Dallas | 01:30:42 | |
| Owen Ellie | 2023 Dublin | 01:31:16 | |
| D'Arcy Nikki | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:30:35 | |
| Burn Alicia | 2024 Birmingham | 01:30:53 | |
| Buß Sabrina | 2019 Leipzig | 01:31:11 | |
| Smith Tina | 2024 London | 01:31:16 | |
| Van Den Haak Debby | 2024 Maastricht | 01:30:45 | |
| Pedretti Aline | 2023 Paris | 01:31:13 | |
| Leijendekker Thomaske | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:31:25 | |
| Bidermane Ieva | 2018 Hamburg | 01:31:19 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Melbourne | 01:39:14 | |
| 2024 Sydney | 01:26:50 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
