Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Singapore using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 605 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:28. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:48 (From 42:20 to 37:32) | 64.3% |
| Sled Pull | 01:07 (From 06:44 to 05:37) | 15.0% |
| Wall Balls | 01:02 (From 07:10 to 06:08) | 13.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:28 (From 04:36 to 04:08) | 6.3% |
| Rowing | 00:03 (From 04:30 to 04:27) | 0.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 02:02 to 02:02) | 0.0% |
| BBJ | 00:00 (From 02:23 to 02:23) | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 01:45 to 01:45) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 04:06 to 04:06) | 0.0% |
| To Daniel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:10 | 00:00 | 04:06 +00:04 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:36 | 04:10 | 04:11 +00:25 | 04:06 +00:04 |
| Running 2 | 04:35 | 08:46 | 04:27 +00:08 | 08:17 +00:29 |
| Sled Push | 02:02 | 13:21 | 03:37 -01:35 | 12:44 +00:37 |
| Running 3 | 05:06 | 15:23 | 04:55 +00:11 | 16:21 -00:58 |
| Sled Pull | 06:44 | 20:29 | 06:07 +00:37 | 21:16 -00:47 |
| Running 4 | 05:12 | 27:13 | 04:53 +00:19 | 27:23 -00:10 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:23 | 32:25 | 04:15 -01:52 | 32:16 +00:09 |
| Running 5 | 05:16 | 34:48 | 04:58 +00:18 | 36:31 -01:43 |
| Rowing | 04:30 | 40:04 | 04:31 -00:01 | 41:29 -01:25 |
| Running 6 | 05:07 | 44:34 | 04:52 +00:15 | 46:00 -01:26 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:45 | 49:41 | 02:12 -00:27 | 50:52 -01:11 |
| Running 7 | 05:26 | 51:26 | 04:57 +00:29 | 53:04 -01:38 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:06 | 56:52 | 04:58 -00:52 | 58:01 -01:09 |
| Running 8 | 07:32 | 01:00:58 | 05:26 +02:06 | 01:02:59 -02:01 |
| Wall Balls | 07:10 | 01:08:30 | 06:39 +00:31 | 01:08:25 +00:05 |
| Roxzone | 05:16 | 01:20:48 | 05:44 -00:28 | 01:20:48 |
Daniel To demonstrated a commendable performance at the 2024 Singapore Hyrox event, securing an overall rank of 35th out of 184 athletes, placing him in the top 19%. Within his age group of 30-34, he ranked 10th, which is within the top 22%. His overall time was 01:20:48.
Daniel's pacing strategy appeared to be slightly conservative at the start, as indicated by his running splits from Running 1 to Running 4 being consistently slower than the average. This approach may have contributed to his energy conservation for later segments. However, his total running time was 3:35 slower than the average, suggesting a need to enhance running efficiency. His strengths are evident in the strength-based segments like the Sled Push and Burpees Broad Jump, where he outperformed most competitors, revealing a strong hybrid athlete profile with a slight emphasis on strength over running.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ehresmann Björn | 2022 Maastricht | 01:21:08 | |
| Garcia Hernandez Javier | 2024 Malaga | 01:20:25 | |
| Clementson Edd | 2022 London | 01:20:20 | |
| Schulte Christoph | 2024 Köln | 01:20:49 | |
| George Thomas | 2024 Turin | 01:20:22 | |
| Desjours Julien | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:21:14 | |
| Hoppel Brett | 2024 Anaheim | 01:20:42 | |
| Dahnke Torsten | 2024 Katowice | 01:20:49 | |
| Montgomery Ross | 2024 Paris | 01:21:07 | |
| Bianchi Mattia | 2024 Manchester | 01:21:14 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Singapore To Daniel | 01:28:36 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
To Daniel
