Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Sherwood Luke's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Sherwood Luke's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Sherwood Luke's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Sherwood Luke's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:36. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 03:03 | 08:03 to 05:00 | 40.1% |
| Sled Pull | 02:21 | 06:15 to 03:54 | 30.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:51 | 04:55 to 04:04 | 11.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:49 | 03:04 to 02:15 | 10.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:25 | 04:26 to 04:01 | 5.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:06 | 01:51 to 01:45 | 1.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 04:11 to 04:10 | 0.2% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:28 to 04:28 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 33:11 to 33:11 | 0.0% |
| Sherwood Luke | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:27 | 00:00 | 04:14 +00:13 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:11 | 04:27 | 04:17 -00:06 | 04:14 +00:13 |
| Running 2 | 03:51 | 08:38 | 04:32 -00:41 | 08:31 +00:07 |
| Sled Push | 03:04 | 12:29 | 02:37 +00:27 | 13:03 -00:34 |
| Running 3 | 03:53 | 15:33 | 04:53 -01:00 | 15:40 -00:07 |
| Sled Pull | 06:15 | 19:26 | 04:20 +01:55 | 20:33 -01:07 |
| Running 4 | 04:13 | 25:41 | 04:52 -00:39 | 24:53 +00:48 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:26 | 29:54 | 04:30 -00:04 | 29:45 +00:09 |
| Running 5 | 04:07 | 34:20 | 04:58 -00:51 | 34:15 +00:05 |
| Rowing | 04:28 | 38:27 | 04:35 -00:07 | 39:13 -00:46 |
| Running 6 | 04:03 | 42:55 | 04:53 -00:50 | 43:48 -00:53 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:51 | 46:58 | 01:57 -00:06 | 48:41 -01:43 |
| Running 7 | 04:16 | 48:49 | 04:52 -00:36 | 50:38 -01:49 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:55 | 53:05 | 04:26 +00:29 | 55:30 -02:25 |
| Running 8 | 04:26 | 58:00 | 05:15 -00:49 | 59:56 -01:56 |
| Wall Balls | 08:03 | 01:02:26 | 05:36 +02:27 | 01:05:11 -02:45 |
| Roxzone | 06:10 | 01:16:28 | 05:41 +00:29 | 01:16:28 |
Luke Sherwood demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX event. His overall rank at 644 places him in the top 15% out of 4107 athletes and his age group rank of 148 puts him in the top 18% of 811 athletes. In terms of running, Luke has shown a strong runner profile with a total running time of 00:33:11, which is 05:35 faster than average. However, his Roxzone time was slower than average, indicating a need for improvement in transition times and overall fitness. His pacing at the beginning of the race started slightly slower but increased in speed throughout the race, indicating a good endurance level.
Going forward, Luke should focus on maintaining a steady pace from the start of the race, conserving energy for the latter part of the race where his current performance tends to drop. He should also work on improving his transition times between exercises, possibly by practicing transitions during his training sessions. Lastly, focusing on strength training particularly in the areas of the wall balls, sled pull, and sled push segments should result in an improved overall time.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kleis Thomas | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:16:05 | |
| Day Karl | 2023 Glasgow | 01:16:24 | |
| Conroy Victor | 2023 Melbourne | 01:16:38 | |
| Saunders Josh | 2024 Birmingham | 01:16:33 | |
| Wichern Tom | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:16:04 | |
| Melham Bas | 2021 London | 01:16:45 | |
| Hebri Mohamed | 2021 Berlin | 01:16:06 | |
| Barisich Thomas | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:16:45 | |
| Besnault Jimmy | 2024 Marseille | 01:16:44 | |
| Ellis Darren | 2023 Glasgow | 01:16:44 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
