Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Pitts Leighton's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Pitts Leighton's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Pitts Leighton's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Pitts Leighton's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:02. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:05 | 44:04 to 40:59 | 76.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:55 | 05:37 to 04:42 | 22.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:02 | 04:33 to 04:31 | 0.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:17 to 04:17 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:16 to 02:16 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:33 to 04:33 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:51 to 01:51 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:08 to 05:08 | 0.0% |
| Pitts Leighton | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:29 | 00:00 | 04:33 -00:04 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:17 | 04:29 | 04:24 -00:07 | 04:33 -00:04 |
| Running 2 | 04:46 | 08:46 | 04:53 -00:07 | 08:57 -00:11 |
| Sled Push | 02:16 | 13:32 | 02:52 -00:36 | 13:50 -00:18 |
| Running 3 | 05:10 | 15:48 | 05:18 -00:08 | 16:42 -00:54 |
| Sled Pull | 04:33 | 20:58 | 04:49 -00:16 | 22:00 -01:02 |
| Running 4 | 05:10 | 25:31 | 05:16 -00:06 | 26:49 -01:18 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:33 | 30:41 | 05:07 -00:34 | 32:05 -01:24 |
| Running 5 | 07:42 | 35:14 | 05:26 +02:16 | 37:12 -01:58 |
| Rowing | 04:38 | 42:56 | 04:46 -00:08 | 42:38 +00:18 |
| Running 6 | 05:20 | 47:34 | 05:18 +00:02 | 47:24 +00:10 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:51 | 52:54 | 02:08 -00:17 | 52:42 +00:12 |
| Running 7 | 05:27 | 54:45 | 05:17 +00:10 | 54:50 -00:05 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:37 | 01:00:12 | 04:57 +00:40 | 01:00:07 +00:05 |
| Running 8 | 06:03 | 01:05:49 | 05:51 +00:12 | 01:05:04 +00:45 |
| Wall Balls | 05:08 | 01:11:52 | 06:16 -01:08 | 01:10:55 +00:57 |
| Roxzone | 06:58 | 01:23:50 | 06:39 +00:19 | 01:23:50 |
Leighton Pitts delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, ranking in the top 26% overall and the top 30% in his age group. His overall finish time was 01:23:50. A key strength lies in his ability to handle strength-based exercises, as evidenced by his excellent performance in the Sled Push and Wall Balls. However, his total running time was 01:53 slower than average, indicating room for improvement in running efficiency. Leighton exhibited a runner's profile, with a tendency to start strong. However, there was a notable slowdown in the Running 5 segment, suggesting a possible burnout or pacing issue early in the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hawkins Elliott | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:24:11 | |
| Matossian Jonathan | 2024 Glasgow | 01:24:13 | |
| Santana Lenin | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:24:11 | |
| Schwimmbeck Lukas | 2024 Köln | 01:23:53 | |
| Scheerle Benjamin | 2019 Hannover | 01:23:23 | |
| Van Mackelenbergh Sjoerd | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:23:36 | |
| Murphy Lee | 2023 Manchester | 01:23:50 | |
| Molina Corte Jairo | 2023 Bilbao | 01:23:51 | |
| Duran Guerrero Jorge | 2023 Bilbao | 01:23:36 | |
| Link Roman | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:23:53 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
