Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2021 New York using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Laird Kyle's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Laird Kyle's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Laird Kyle's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Laird Kyle's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:02. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:29 | 43:48 to 41:19 | 49.3% |
| Sled Push | 01:18 | 03:58 to 02:40 | 25.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:30 | 05:05 to 04:35 | 9.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:30 | 05:25 to 04:55 | 9.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:12 | 02:13 to 02:01 | 4.0% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 04:46 to 04:43 | 1.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:22 to 04:22 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:18 to 04:18 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:32 to 05:32 | 0.0% |
| Laird Kyle | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:16 | 00:00 | 04:34 -00:18 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:22 | 04:16 | 04:25 -00:03 | 04:34 -00:18 |
| Running 2 | 05:18 | 08:38 | 04:54 +00:24 | 08:59 -00:21 |
| Sled Push | 03:58 | 13:56 | 02:52 +01:06 | 13:53 +00:03 |
| Running 3 | 05:32 | 17:54 | 05:21 +00:11 | 16:45 +01:09 |
| Sled Pull | 05:05 | 23:26 | 04:51 +00:14 | 22:06 +01:20 |
| Running 4 | 05:32 | 28:31 | 05:19 +00:13 | 26:57 +01:34 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:25 | 34:03 | 05:13 +00:12 | 32:16 +01:47 |
| Running 5 | 05:42 | 39:28 | 05:29 +00:13 | 37:29 +01:59 |
| Rowing | 04:46 | 45:10 | 04:47 -00:01 | 42:58 +02:12 |
| Running 6 | 05:39 | 49:56 | 05:21 +00:18 | 47:45 +02:11 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:13 | 55:35 | 02:08 +00:05 | 53:06 +02:29 |
| Running 7 | 05:43 | 57:48 | 05:19 +00:24 | 55:14 +02:34 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:18 | 01:03:31 | 05:00 -00:42 | 01:00:33 +02:58 |
| Running 8 | 06:08 | 01:07:49 | 05:55 +00:13 | 01:05:33 +02:16 |
| Wall Balls | 05:32 | 01:13:57 | 06:22 -00:50 | 01:11:28 +02:29 |
| Roxzone | 05:09 | 01:24:32 | 06:42 -01:33 | 01:24:32 |
Pacing and Profile: Kyle's overall pacing was steady throughout the race, with no significant fluctuations. However, his total running time was 02:53 slower than the average, indicating that he could benefit from improving his running abilities. To address this, Kyle should focus on incorporating more specific running training into his routine.
Incorporating these strategies, along with the specific training techniques and exercises mentioned, will help Kyle Laird enhance his performance in future Hyrox races. By focusing on improving his running abilities, building strength in key segments, and implementing effective race strategies, Kyle can continue to excel in his fitness journey.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Moushon Benjamin | 2023 Chicago | 01:25:00 | |
| Casey Jack | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:24:45 | |
| Gilhespy Jonathan | 2024 London | 01:25:01 | |
| Mesquita Luis | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:24:49 | |
| Bailey Craig | 2024 Madrid | 01:24:15 | |
| Soares Alexis | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:24:21 | |
| Simmonds Blake | 2023 Birmingham | 01:24:26 | |
| Goodfellow Jase | 2024 Sydney | 01:24:37 | |
| Howerton Kannon | 2023 Dallas | 01:24:04 | |
| Pargan Miralem | 2023 München | 01:24:06 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Los Angeles | 01:26:02 | |
| 2021 Los Angeles | 01:37:29 | |
| 2021 Dallas | 01:33:02 | |
| 2023 Chicago - North American Open Championship | 01:29:00 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
