Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Malaga using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 744 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Gaskell Evangeline's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Gaskell Evangeline's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Gaskell Evangeline's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Gaskell Evangeline's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:01. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Farmers Carry | 02:45 | 05:13 to 02:28 | 54.8% |
| Run Total | 02:03 | 52:48 to 50:45 | 40.9% |
| Rowing | 00:13 | 05:51 to 05:38 | 4.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:17 to 05:17 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:46 to 02:46 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:19 to 06:19 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:15 to 06:15 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:14 to 05:14 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:03 to 05:03 | 0.0% |
| Gaskell Evangeline | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:25 | 00:00 | 05:38 +00:47 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:17 | 06:25 | 05:21 -00:04 | 05:38 +00:47 |
| Running 2 | 05:34 | 11:42 | 06:09 -00:35 | 10:59 +00:43 |
| Sled Push | 02:46 | 17:16 | 03:08 -00:22 | 17:08 +00:08 |
| Running 3 | 06:32 | 20:02 | 06:29 +00:03 | 20:16 -00:14 |
| Sled Pull | 06:19 | 26:34 | 06:45 -00:26 | 26:45 -00:11 |
| Running 4 | 06:53 | 32:53 | 06:33 +00:20 | 33:30 -00:37 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:15 | 39:46 | 07:33 -01:18 | 40:03 -00:17 |
| Running 5 | 06:18 | 46:01 | 06:44 -00:26 | 47:36 -01:35 |
| Rowing | 05:51 | 52:19 | 05:42 +00:09 | 54:20 -02:01 |
| Running 6 | 06:02 | 58:10 | 06:35 -00:33 | 01:00:02 -01:52 |
| Farmers Carry | 05:13 | 01:04:12 | 02:31 +02:42 | 01:06:37 -02:25 |
| Running 7 | 06:34 | 01:09:25 | 06:35 -00:01 | 01:09:08 +00:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:14 | 01:15:59 | 05:41 -00:27 | 01:15:43 +00:16 |
| Running 8 | 08:33 | 01:21:13 | 07:14 +01:19 | 01:21:24 -00:11 |
| Wall Balls | 05:03 | 01:29:46 | 06:07 -01:04 | 01:28:38 +01:08 |
| Roxzone | 08:24 | 01:43:06 | 08:21 +00:03 | 01:43:06 |
Evangeline Gaskell's performance in the 2024 Malaga HYROX race places her in the top 27% overall and top 42% within her age group, a commendable achievement among 1012 athletes. Notably, her total running time was marginally slower than average, indicating a more balanced competency between running and strength exercises, with a slight inclination towards strength. Initial splits suggest she started the race at a slower pace but managed to recover in subsequent running segments, indicating a potential to improve her pacing strategy. Despite her balanced profile, areas such as the Farmers Carry significantly affected her ranking, suggesting a need for focused improvement on specific strength elements and transition efficiency.
By focusing on these key areas and implementing the suggested training strategies, Evangeline can significantly improve her performance in future HYROX races, turning her weaker segments into strengths and refining her race strategies for a more competitive finish.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Basma Basma | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:43:29 | |
| Rudolph Silke | 2023 Hamburg | 01:43:16 | |
| Hartley Jayne | 2022 London | 01:42:59 | |
| Ross Hannah | 2024 Birmingham | 01:42:36 | |
| Beattie Kim | 2024 Birmingham | 01:43:04 | |
| Vences Valdez Samantha Yatziri | 2024 Mexico City | 01:43:30 | |
| Willsmer Carla | 2022 London | 01:43:05 | |
| Harrison Allison | 2024 Birmingham | 01:43:30 | |
| Menconi Sophia | 2024 Madrid | 01:42:42 | |
| Schmitt Verena | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:42:57 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Copenhagen | 01:43:06 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
