Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
1000 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Run, Baby, Run!
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Station Showdown
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Fast, slow, or steady?
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Expected Finish Time
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station.
Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
Spread of Splits Time
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
05:19.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance
Rick Eigenhuis showcased a commendable performance during the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, securing an overall rank of 1882 out of 3118 athletes and 330 in his age group (35-39). His total time was 01:42:27, placing him in the top 60% of competitors. A notable strength was his ability to perform strength-based exercises significantly faster than the average, particularly in the Sled Push and Sandbag Lunges. However, his total running time was 00:53:38, which was 03:16 slower than the average, indicating that running is an area for improvement. Rick's pacing started strong with a fast Running 1 segment but slowed considerably in the subsequent runs, suggesting he initially set a pace that was too fast to maintain. This pattern indicates a need for a more balanced approach to pacing and a focus on enhancing running endurance.
Segments to Improve
Total Running Time: Rick's running segments, particularly Running 2 through Running 8, were consistently slower than average. This indicates a need to improve running endurance and efficiency.
Training Strategies:
Incorporate interval training to enhance speed and endurance. For example, 400m repeats with decreasing rest periods.
Focus on long-distance runs at a steady pace to build aerobic capacity.
Practice tempo runs to improve lactate threshold and maintain a faster pace for longer.
Roxzone: The time spent in transitions was 01:00 slower than average, indicating a need for improved transition efficiency.
Training Strategies:
Conduct brick workouts that simulate race conditions, transitioning quickly between running and strength exercises.
Practice specific transition drills to minimize time lost, such as setting up stations at home or in the gym to mimic the race environment.
Sled Pull: Rick was 00:26 slower than average, indicating potential technique or strength issues.
Training Strategies:
Include sled pull drills in training, focusing on form and maintaining a steady pace.
Incorporate exercises such as bent-over rows and core workouts to improve upper body strength and stability.
Race Strategies
Pacemaking: Start with a conservative pace during the initial running segments to conserve energy for later stages. Establish a target pace based on training runs and stick to it, adjusting as needed based on how the body feels during the race.
Transition Efficiency: Develop a mental checklist for each transition to ensure quick and smooth changes between segments. Practice these routines during training to make them second nature on race day.
Compromised Running: Focus on maintaining form and cadence when transitioning from strength to running segments. Implement strength-to-run workouts in training to simulate fatigue and improve running efficiency under tired conditions.