Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 238 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Burgess Aimee's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Burgess Aimee's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Burgess Aimee's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Burgess Aimee's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:51. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:24 | 13:41 to 09:17 | 56.1% |
| Run Total | 02:30 | 01:00:26 to 57:56 | 31.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:52 | 07:40 to 06:48 | 11.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:05 | 07:49 to 07:44 | 1.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:09 to 05:09 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:21 to 02:21 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:40 to 06:40 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:20 to 05:20 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:16 to 02:16 | 0.0% |
| Burgess Aimee | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:10 | 00:00 | 06:27 -00:17 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:09 | 06:10 | 05:38 -00:29 | 06:27 -00:17 |
| Running 2 | 07:05 | 11:19 | 06:56 +00:09 | 12:05 -00:46 |
| Sled Push | 02:21 | 18:24 | 03:36 -01:15 | 19:01 -00:37 |
| Running 3 | 07:21 | 20:45 | 07:28 -00:07 | 22:37 -01:52 |
| Sled Pull | 06:40 | 28:06 | 08:03 -01:23 | 30:05 -01:59 |
| Running 4 | 07:47 | 34:46 | 07:31 +00:16 | 38:08 -03:22 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 13:41 | 42:33 | 09:47 +03:54 | 45:39 -03:06 |
| Running 5 | 07:48 | 56:14 | 07:55 -00:07 | 55:26 +00:48 |
| Rowing | 05:20 | 01:04:02 | 06:06 -00:46 | 01:03:21 +00:41 |
| Running 6 | 07:27 | 01:09:22 | 07:45 -00:18 | 01:09:27 -00:05 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:16 | 01:16:49 | 02:55 -00:39 | 01:17:12 -00:23 |
| Running 7 | 07:44 | 01:19:05 | 07:43 +00:01 | 01:20:07 -01:02 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:40 | 01:26:49 | 07:15 +00:25 | 01:27:50 -01:01 |
| Running 8 | 09:07 | 01:34:29 | 08:54 +00:13 | 01:35:05 -00:36 |
| Wall Balls | 07:49 | 01:43:36 | 07:50 -00:01 | 01:43:59 -00:23 |
| Roxzone | 10:41 | 02:01:59 | 10:10 +00:31 | 02:01:59 |
Aimee Burgess delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, finishing within the top 34% of overall competitors and her age group. Her total running time was notably swift, being 01:25 faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. However, her performance in certain strength segments suggests areas for improvement. The pacing analysis reveals that Aimee started the race at a strong pace, particularly excelling in the initial running segments and maintaining a consistent performance throughout. Her proficiency in running, combined with a need for enhanced strength training, suggests a hybrid athlete profile leaning towards running.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Blight Kate | 2023 London | 02:02:20 | |
| Evans Lindsay | 2024 New York | 02:02:04 | |
| Burgess Aimee | 2024 Melbourne | 02:01:59 | |
| Ohlrich Ulrike | 2018 Hamburg | 02:01:45 | |
| Grabski Lisa | 2023 Dallas | 02:02:26 | |
| Köllner Jenny | 2024 Hamburg | 02:01:33 | |
| Chávez Torres Frida | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 02:01:57 | |
| Nash Debrenda | 2022 Dallas | 02:02:17 | |
| Valdez Mariana | 2024 Mexico City | 02:02:23 | |
| Matabuena Agatha Josephine | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 02:02:06 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Sydney | 02:03:25 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
