Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Williams Brendan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Williams Brendan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Williams Brendan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Williams Brendan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:59. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:53 | 52:45 to 45:52 | 98.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:06 | 02:26 to 02:20 | 1.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:09 to 04:09 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:06 to 02:06 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:04 to 05:04 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:21 to 05:21 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:55 to 04:55 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:29 to 04:29 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:32 to 05:32 | 0.0% |
| Williams Brendan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:12 | 00:00 | 04:58 +00:14 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:09 | 05:12 | 04:36 -00:27 | 04:58 +00:14 |
| Running 2 | 05:39 | 09:21 | 05:23 +00:16 | 09:34 -00:13 |
| Sled Push | 02:06 | 15:00 | 03:13 -01:07 | 14:57 +00:03 |
| Running 3 | 10:20 | 17:06 | 05:51 +04:29 | 18:10 -01:04 |
| Sled Pull | 05:04 | 27:26 | 05:34 -00:30 | 24:01 +03:25 |
| Running 4 | 05:55 | 32:30 | 05:52 +00:03 | 29:35 +02:55 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:21 | 38:25 | 06:17 -00:56 | 35:27 +02:58 |
| Running 5 | 06:17 | 43:46 | 06:06 +00:11 | 41:44 +02:02 |
| Rowing | 04:55 | 50:03 | 05:03 -00:08 | 47:50 +02:13 |
| Running 6 | 06:08 | 54:58 | 05:55 +00:13 | 52:53 +02:05 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:26 | 01:01:06 | 02:26 +00:00 | 58:48 +02:18 |
| Running 7 | 06:28 | 01:03:32 | 05:54 +00:34 | 01:01:14 +02:18 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:29 | 01:10:00 | 05:52 -01:23 | 01:07:08 +02:52 |
| Running 8 | 06:50 | 01:14:29 | 06:50 +00:00 | 01:13:00 +01:29 |
| Wall Balls | 05:32 | 01:21:19 | 07:35 -02:03 | 01:19:50 +01:29 |
| Roxzone | 08:49 | 01:35:32 | 08:07 +00:42 | 01:35:32 |
Brendan Williams' performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event was commendable, placing him in the top 45% overall and top 46% within his age group. His standout strengths were evident in several strength-based exercises, where he achieved high percentile ranks, such as the Ski Erg and Sled Push, indicating a strong proficiency in strength-oriented challenges. However, his overall running time was 5:32 slower than the average, suggesting that his running performance is an area that requires attention. Brendan's pacing indicates a potential strategy of starting conservatively, as seen in the significantly slower Running 3 segment compared to the average. His profile leans more towards strength, with room for improvement in running capabilities to enhance his overall hybrid fitness performance.
Brendan's total running performance was slower than average, specifically during Running 3. This suggests a need for improved endurance and speed.
The transition time in the Roxzone was slower than average, indicating a potential area for efficiency improvements.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Forsgren Daniel | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:35:58 | |
| Embrechts Erik | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:35:14 | |
| Valom Ewald | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:35:04 | |
| Schulzki Dieter | 2021 Stuttgart | 01:35:11 | |
| Hoffmann Eduard | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:35:12 | |
| Wassmann Martin | 2023 Hamburg | 01:35:34 | |
| Whelan Marcus | 2024 Sydney | 01:35:41 | |
| Deleon Arturo | 2024 Dallas | 01:35:10 | |
| Perrie Gavin | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:35:41 | |
| Wouts Alain | 2024 Marseille | 01:35:25 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Melbourne | 01:28:09 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
